If you can feel a very small tinge of existential horror when you read the words “try to”, congratulations, you’re a true *nix devotee.

If legislators get grumpy about this, just gently thwap them with your handy copy of The Unix Haters Handbook and tell them you’re working as hard as you can under the circumstances.

      • KindaABigDyl@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        Why? As long as they release the source, it should still be good. Californians will just have to build everything themselves and risk breaking the law

        • groet@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          They will make it so that “allowing users from California to download the OS (or code) from you is already a crime”. So for example canoical will have to geoblock californians from downloading ubuntu and any peer-to-peer downloads will be illegal anyway because fuck you.

          • KindaABigDyl@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Right. That’s the idea. Since Cali has a dumb law, it would be illegal to download Ubuntu in California. Californians follow their law, Ubuntu has to change nothing.

            But how is that a license violation on Canonical’s part?

            • groet@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              License? I never mentioned licenses.

              Selling drugs is illegal because drugs are illegal. If a OS without age verification is illegal, then (depending on how stupid the laws are) having a site where you can download such a OS could also be declared illegal.

              Basically force all providers of OSs to include verification or block downloads to those states, or face fines for “distributing illegal software”.

              I am saying, if they are stupid enough to do X they might be stupid enough to try the even more stupid thing to achieve X.

        • Peck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t think you can restrict the usage geographically under LGPL. Oh course it’s unlikely to be enforced, but it’s license violation nonetheless.

      • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        (swat team bursts through your door)

        (They ignore your pile of guns, alcohol, marijuana)

        (They ignore the Epstein files you printed out)

        (They read out your crimes. You have a bootable USB with Ubuntu.)

        (They lock you up.)

        (Before they leave, they walk over and shoot your dog.)

        • Peck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ain’t nobody cares about you sir. The issue in software distributor ie distro maintainer