• Atlas_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s definitely wrong to degrade or harass this guy for doing it.

    Buuut this is being made to support a bad law that should be opposed. The law is a bellwether for compulsory age and identity verification, which should strike fear into the hearts of everyone. And especially everyone who cares about their privacy (which really should be everyone, but …).

    Furthermore, it’s questionable whether a law like this can apply to open source software. IMO it really can’t - who exactly is liable? Is the world really better with ageless Linux outlawed?

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This is one of the most sensible comments in the thread. The law is the problem. This is something which should have been self regulated by websites themselves, but Meta lobbied for laws like this so they wouldn’t have to police it. The law making this mandatory for everyone when this should be a parental control is the issue.

    • sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This is a law that companies are required to implement or stop making business in the states enforcing that law.

      You probably feel that companies should just stop doing business in those states “to show them”. Sadly a lot of profitable Linux companies that fund Linux development disagree with your high morals. They want to continue doing business there.

      Adding that field help those company comply with the law and doesn’t hurt you in anyway except maybe taking few bytes in your disk drive.

      Even if the field is not added, those companies would come up with another place to store date of birth or even use systemd fork.

      Its not like they will say since we can’t store date of birth in systemd’s user model then we’ll have to abandon this project and close our branches in those states instead.

      • Atlas_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Yes it’s technically trivial. I have read the patch. That’s beside the point, which is social and political.

        I get to decide and report what does and does not hurt me thankyouverymuch. And I do think this is a step that erodes my right to privacy, taken with shockingly little discussion. (Which got it reverted)

        There’s a lot of degrees of freedom between “just comply bro” and “good luck enforcing that”. For example https://blog.system76.com/post/system76-on-age-verification