(I’m just trying to learn. No hidden mockery in this and this is no gotcha bs aimed at t women. I’m NOT transphobic. Just saw this in a debate and wanted to know other people’s thoughts)

I just want to know:

  1. Is this factually correct?
  2. If it is, does it matter? Why or why not?
  3. How would you logically respond to this?
  4. How does this statement not contradict with Trans Women are Women
  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    who cares

    if someone asks to be called she/her/susan then just do it. it doesn’t need to be so complicated

    conservatives ranting about biology are attacking a straw man. nobody actually gives a shit

    • moakley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s just a matter of politeness. It’s rude to call someone something they don’t want to be called.

    • NostraDavid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      if someone asks to be called she/her/susan then just do it.

      In my life I’ve only met one person who noted her pronouns, and none (including her) who ever asked for specific pronouns use. That’s shit is such a weird Americanism. You’re weird if you do that.

      • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        normally you specify preferred pronouns on the internet or in documentation. in real life, most of the folks in my circles are making it as obvious as possible by communicating it through presentation, or by telling you their name.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Change rooms should be unisex either way and professional sports is totally solvable - we already have weight classes etc but at the end of the day sports is just entertainment and not what we should be basing our society about. It can fuck off and disappear for all I care - plenty if other entertainment out there.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The reason why sports are segregated by gender is because men can’t stand to lose to women.

          Think about this. Why are even non-contact sports segregated? Tennis? Why?!

          Even chess is segregated by gender. Chess!

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            The reason athletic sports are segregated by gender is because physically, cis men vastly outperform cis women. Like, if we got rid of gender divisions altogether, cis men would be the only ones competing. I think it’s unfair to both cis and transgender female athletes to effectively bar them from competitions altogether.

            For nonathletic sports, it’s more complicated. In chess, for example, the best female chess player in history is the 64th best chess player overall. The second best woman doesn’t break the top 140. I assume this is because of historical discrimination against women in the chess community leading to them being underrepresented at the top. Having women’s divisions is good because it encourages women to play.

            To be clear, trans women are women, so it only makes sense to have them compete against other women.

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Why are even non-contact sports segregated? Tennis? Why?!

            This has been tested on multiple occasions

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Sexes_(tennis)

            The only real win in singles was Billie Jean King (then 29yo) over Bobby Riggs (then 55yo). Riggs had recently beaten Margaret Court who was a 17 year number one in the women’s game.

            Martina Navratilova in 2023 stated that the reason the 55-year-old Riggs lost to the 29-year-old King was simply because of age.[37] Navratilova said Riggs lost “because Bobby was too old,” and added, “A 35 year old Bobby would have beaten all of us.”[37]

          • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Maybe bit it’s more likely it’s jus5 entertainment based. Women leagues are created to attract more viewers/participants.

          • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes abolishing of woman sports if that helps you understand it. We can easily redesign sports grouping - it’s not nuclear weapons, not rocket science. It’s easy.

      • jtrek@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well surely you can agree that letting men into women’s change rooms

        If the idea is that that’s a no-no because men are sexually attracted to women, then I must remind you that gay people exist.

        If the idea is that men cannot be trusted, then there are many other spaces where men have power that should be examined first.

      • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        You conservatives spend an insane amount of time thinking about and making shit up about children’s genitals. It’s so fucking wet and creepy.

          • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Oh sweet baby Jesus… 🤦…
            Uhm thanks for pointing that out…

            The word was supposed to be “weird” and there’s no sane way, no matter how badly I smashed my big fat appendages across the screen, that spell correct could have thought I meant to type “wet”, but yet somehow that’s what it chose.

            My phone finally forced me to let it update to the newer os stuffed full of ai, and now does some insanely weird spell corrections. It will even sometimes change words that I have spelled correctly to things that mean something completely different. But this one is a real beauty. Honestly, it’s so fucked up that I am just going to leave it.

            • Skanky@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I’m pretty sure everybody understands what happened here. Good on you for keeping it, because it’s hysterical!