cm0002@suppo.fi to Linux@programming.dev · 21 hours agoOfficial Linux position on LLM usage in kernel developmentlore.kernel.orgexternal-linkmessage-square17linkfedilinkarrow-up163arrow-down12
arrow-up161arrow-down1external-linkOfficial Linux position on LLM usage in kernel developmentlore.kernel.orgcm0002@suppo.fi to Linux@programming.dev · 21 hours agomessage-square17linkfedilink
minus-squarehalfapage@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agothat’s fair, my bad the problem could arise when it comes to figuring out whose responsibility it is when the snippet makes it’s way into the code though also llm arguably has access to a lot more proprietary source codes than a few humans normally could the way people willingly give access to a lot of IP, that normally would be somehow guarded, to llm companies is puzzling the fact that they do it because the management basically asked them to is even more puzzling
minus-squaredream_weasel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 hour agoIt’s the same as when you use any generative tool: if your name is on it, it’s your problem, tools aren’t accountable.
that’s fair, my bad
the problem could arise when it comes to figuring out whose responsibility it is when the snippet makes it’s way into the code though
also llm arguably has access to a lot more proprietary source codes than a few humans normally could
the way people willingly give access to a lot of IP, that normally would be somehow guarded, to llm companies is puzzling
the fact that they do it because the management basically asked them to is even more puzzling
It’s the same as when you use any generative tool: if your name is on it, it’s your problem, tools aren’t accountable.