also this insane hiring process

    • Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Gdm is slow and buggy comparatively, imo. Gnome has always lagged behind on stability and speed for me, and Cinnamon doesn’t do much to fix those issues for its simplicity.

      For its simplicity, were I to choose less features and the minimal design Cinnamon goes for, I’d rather just have XFCE instead. Similar look and function, more mature, if older.

      This really comes out if you try KDE on a lower-powered system like an ARM phone. KDE-touch is way more grounded and quick than the gnome solutions.

        • Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Garuda is like if someone decided to tick every box they possibly could. I’m not saying they’re good or bad, it’s just, I believe in chaos theory to a degree. Something’s gonna break. It’s a bit much. I’m fine with slapping plasma on Arch and calling it a day.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I daily drove garuda for a few years when I first switched to linux and yep, you summed it up perfectly. Beautiful and cool but too many problems. Eventually broke bad enough I switched to nobara.

          • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Perhaps. I should probably just stick with Mint for now, I really just need my computer to pave the way for my work and hobbies and every time I start to tinker I either break something or feel like I’ve wasted time.