• 0 Posts
  • 220 Comments
Joined 6 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2020

help-circle



  • verdigris@lemmy.mltolinuxmemes@lemmy.world•intimidating
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Nano/micro are great for people who need a terminal text editor but don’t want to learn anything to use it.

    If you do want to put some time into learning, it really doesn’t take long to get to a point of base competency in emacs or vim – less than an hour for sure to just be able to move around in the document and have a basic understanding of the editing controls.

    Both are hugely deep systems that you can keep learning for years, but only at the pace that you need; most tasks can be accomplished pretty easily with a bunch of inputs, but there’s usually a much faster way if you know the shortcuts.

    As for the difference, vim is more modal – you switch to editing mode, do some editing, then switch to typing mode and type. Most commands are one to three sequential button presses. For some more exotic functionality you use the command line to type a command, which has auto-complete.

    On the other hand emacs is chorded, meaning you use multiple simultaneous keys to do functions, usually a modifier key like ctrl + something else. This gives you more direct power while actually typing, but IMO has a bit steeper of a learning curve, and I just personally don’t love the chorded inputs, I think they’re more work to input than the sequences in vim. But either editor will give you unprecedented power over text with minimal fuss.

    I personally use Helix, which is basically just a slightly different take on Vim, as well as taking inspiration from Kakoune which is another competitor. It’s got really nice modern defaults and I like the way that Kakoune treats selections in contrast to Vim.










  • It’s a tool for the owners, it’s a trap for the users. The sycophancy and malleability of the chatbots makes them not just unsuitable as replacements for therapists, they can be and often are actively harmful, validating problematic, spiraling or psychotic thought patterns.

    I know that therapy isn’t accessible for everyone, but any actual human you can talk to is better than a chat bot in this context.

    I would rather someone vibe code critical infrastructure with a chat bot than use it for mental health.



  • Chatbots? Basically nothing. Any interaction I have with one leads to spending more time verifying its output, inevitably finding many mistakes, and eventually finding a primary source for what I’m actually looking for. The best actual impact it has is forcing me to narrow down my nebulous question into what I actually specifically want, but the bot itself is contributing very little to that.

    Neutral nets in general have limited real usefulness in analyzing large batches of data when other purpose-built analysis software doesn’t exist.

    “AI” is a misnomer and there is absolutely zero evidence to suggest that we’re even on a path toward actual AI, sometimes called AGI, though they’re also changing that to just mean a profitable LLM which is fucking hilarious.

    Any task you use a bot to do, you will become worse at that task. For mass data analysis, that’s fine, poring over reams of data is already a skill that other technology has largely obsoleted. But using it to do research, to read or write for you, or god forbid to make actual decisions and think for you, are very slippery slopes that are already causing a lot of the general public to seriously erode their basic mental capabilities.