Linux really is the reason I dont’ play anymore. Thank you linux.

Woah, they take the blame and apologize. This is not often seen and commands respect.

I use helix btw

Thank thee

Hmm, i tried to make a joke about thanking both parent posters, which makes them a plural noun, which makes thou wrong as it is only used for singular.

But i guess i was wrong in an orthogonal dimension as well.

Ok, i’m on board. Thank thou two

Yeah, but I think it is speaking in first person, about itself. So it should be “I saw” and “I think”, regardless of its pronouns in third person.

Yea, but socket is not a file. Maybe if you stretch the definition.

Well in any case, when people say that linux is great because everything is a file, they either mean that:

• they can edit configuration of most things with a text editor, or that
• in bash (and other shells) it is easy to work with byte streams, piping them from one process to another and compose complex behaviour from simple commands.

It could be a process, which you can talk to only via an IPC call. For example, dbus

What would you say is the benefit to the consumer of common ownership here?

Damn, this actually looks really good! Is there an estimate on when this will be useable-ish as a main phone for non-dev users?

sus of them to drop the slogan “don’t be evil”

What’s the other 10%? BSD?

I mean, updating the rules would help - clarifying that feeding data to any model / doing analysis on it requires copyright - but I doubt that it would stop companies from doing it. Because it is hard to prove in court that your work has been stolen.

But there is no real way of enforcing the rules. How would be combat piracy? If you make BitTorrent protocol illegal, people will just that using HTTP or anything else to share copyright-ed material.

Interesting, but probably not general and scalable way of fighting this problem. This practice is would be hard to implement for other types of content.

I think that copyright law is inherently unfit for internet. In its core, it is a legal restriction on re-publishing content which cannot be enforced on the internet. It does not prevent piracy or AI companies from collecting data. So I’d say that we should do away with copyright law altogether. This would, of course, remove a lot of incentive for producing content, but I think people would still produce content, even if they are not paid to do it, as long as their basic needs are satisfied. So if we, as a human race, progress to UBI, we can also solve copyright problem.

But if we get stuck in capitalistic age, I guess we have to pretend that information can be owned and legally restricted from redistribution.

Oh, so it actually is GNU operating system. And the thing that I’m using is then Linux operating system, with some GNU tooling. So the quotation is not only overly pedantic, but also wrong.

What’s this building? I suspect this might be a crime against architecture as a field.

Oh, i have to try these out to see if it effects my development cycle. I do notice that cargo check is super fast, but cargo build takes a long time. So codegen and linker could be the source of slowness.

For a clean build: number of cores (because cargo builds each crate dependency in a separate process), for a build of your crate only: single core perf.

This is all hard to do because it is hard to determine people’s race on lemmy. Some usernames give it away but most don’t. And I don’t go snooping trough their post history to find that out.