

sus of them to drop the slogan “don’t be evil”
sus of them to drop the slogan “don’t be evil”
I mean, updating the rules would help - clarifying that feeding data to any model / doing analysis on it requires copyright - but I doubt that it would stop companies from doing it. Because it is hard to prove in court that your work has been stolen.
But there is no real way of enforcing the rules. How would be combat piracy? If you make BitTorrent protocol illegal, people will just that using HTTP or anything else to share copyright-ed material.
Interesting, but probably not general and scalable way of fighting this problem. This practice is would be hard to implement for other types of content.
I think that copyright law is inherently unfit for internet. In its core, it is a legal restriction on re-publishing content which cannot be enforced on the internet. It does not prevent piracy or AI companies from collecting data. So I’d say that we should do away with copyright law altogether. This would, of course, remove a lot of incentive for producing content, but I think people would still produce content, even if they are not paid to do it, as long as their basic needs are satisfied. So if we, as a human race, progress to UBI, we can also solve copyright problem.
But if we get stuck in capitalistic age, I guess we have to pretend that information can be owned and legally restricted from redistribution.
Oh, so it actually is GNU operating system. And the thing that I’m using is then Linux operating system, with some GNU tooling. So the quotation is not only overly pedantic, but also wrong.
What’s this building? I suspect this might be a crime against architecture as a field.
Oh, i have to try these out to see if it effects my development cycle. I do notice that cargo check is super fast, but cargo build takes a long time. So codegen and linker could be the source of slowness.
For a clean build: number of cores (because cargo builds each crate dependency in a separate process), for a build of your crate only: single core perf.
This is all hard to do because it is hard to determine people’s race on lemmy. Some usernames give it away but most don’t. And I don’t go snooping trough their post history to find that out.
Giving them access to Jellyfin is not fully “copying” a movie, it is just access to streaming (they can download, but that’s on them).
Overall, this makes little sense anymore and I feel that limiting data sharing is hard to conceptualize, let alone prevent with regulation.
All responses are saying “it is illegal”. But is it more illegal than pirating a movie for yourself only? Would it still be illegal if you would have paid for the movie? In that case it seems like lending the dvd to a friend…
That’s cool, post a link here when you’re done, I want to see what you cook up.
Good, we have been in a drought of js frameworks lately: https://dayssincelastjsframework.com/
Joking aside, that’s your selling feature?
It started as actual unpublished technical descriptions of underlying technology.
If they made that, they could also make it so one can pay 10x more for each additional icon.
So 10e for one, 100e for two, 1000e for three and so on.
This would allow us to recognise all people seeking attention by flashing money very easily. Bonus points if we are able to filter feeds by number of icons.
I wouldn’t say that Linux & Gimp are objectively better, but they sure are better in the long run, since you plop “gimp” into a nix configuration and never have to deal with installation and cracking.
Wait what? What does that even mean? Is he their boss? Is he paying them? Does he mind control them?
I didn’t even notice the new actors, a testimony to how good they are!
What’s DRM in this context? Surely linux kernel doesn’t do digital rights management?
Damn, this actually looks really good! Is there an estimate on when this will be useable-ish as a main phone for non-dev users?