For context: I habe a PC with an 8gb SSD and I somehow need to get an app on there that only has a flatpak release

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    People bitching about Flatpaks don’t understand that they have dedupe built in. You’re literally not using any more space and it’s easier for app developers to deploy.

    Try using Snaps sometime, if you want something to actually bitch about.

  • Shayeta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    No problem, just makr sure your system has the exact version of libraries the application needs. And oh, you will only update those dependencies when the application update updates the requirements.

    Oh what’s that? Another application you want to install uses the same lib but different version? Tough luck, chump!

    Seriously it’s either flatpaks or the multi-version dependency management that openSUSE has, and you’re not saving much more space here either.

    • rice@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      or statically compiling literally everything then you got 50 copies of the same thing like windows & macos!

  • gamer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Flatpaks implement deduping, so they actually don’t take that much space when installed.

    I habe a PC with an 8gb SSD

    I think I found your real problem.

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    So maybe use Debian and compile the app yourself instead? The Dev made something free with their time, use your time to make it work for you.

  • rice@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s very efficient for what it does. and your programs will actually open.

  • FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Another missed occasion to have taken a screenshot. There’s gnome-screenshot, scrot, your DE’s integrated tool and so many others to choose from, you can do it!

    That sort of shit makes me hate the modern internet. (Also screenshots are cleaner and therefore compress better since you seem to care (rightfully) about storage space.)

    • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah but if youre using a lemmy app on your phone its significantly faster to just use your phone camera rather than having to share/transfer the file over somehow, or sign into lemmy on your pc. Im not saying you’re wrong, but i get why someone wouldn’t care for a quick throwaway post. Also storage then isnt an issue on the PC at all because the image is only on the phone.

      • FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Phones also have limited storage?

        Regardless, posting on the desktop is exactly as hard as typing in the name of your instance and your credentials…

        If you’re gonna be editing a meme, typing comments and such, it’s worth it very fast imo.

        And crucially, it’s a really basic form of respect for your audience. Oh and also framing the shot correctly, we’re missing part of the text…

        • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah but their computer is what had limited storage. Most phones these days have a lot more than 8gb. Idk like i said youre not wrong but i still got what they were trying to communicate.

  • krull_krull@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    “maybe a software being excessively bloated isn’t a good thing”

    “just buy more storage bro”

    B*tch. i live in a third world country, with limited internet and data plan, and also is still a student. If i can just buy more storage and better hardware i will.

    • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      This excuse is so dumb for many reasons. Provide me the source and I will make my own package if needed.

      The same excuse is used to make terribly performing video games… Just buy a better graphics card if you want to run <any modern game> at over 60fps!

    • Luffy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yes, I personally use flatpak because I want a reliable way to update packages that are not in the native repositories. Still, I would love if it would be like snaps in the sense that I can use the native libraries and only install the app as flatpak.

      Its just really frustrating to have to install the whole fricking gnome desktop again just so some flatpak can use it

    • Luffy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      Sort of, actually

      I was trying to build a PC just to play internet radio on using Shortwave, and a 30€ thin client with 4 1,5Ghz cores and no active cooling, 4 gigs of ram and an 8gb ssd were more than enough for that

      • rice@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        this? https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/Shortwave

        I think on a system like that you shouldn’t even run a GUI or a window manager at most. What is the service that is actually using though, it links to this https://www.radio-browser.info/ I guess I see you can play stations directly from that. It seems it makes more sense to use like lynx browser or something to just browse that website directly.

        I’ve clicked like 10 of them they are all mp3 or aac. mpv or vlc can decode those on the command line and play it with using like 15-100mb of space on your storage. Like this random station for example https://stream-uk1.radioparadise.com/aac-320

        all in all your total install should be like 400mb

        • Luffy@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          It is not for me personally, but for a person who wants a gui. And a Touch screen. Also I need an on Screen Keyboard because he also does not want to use a keyboard or mouse.

          I tried using a very simple compositor like cage to just start shortwave, but I couldnt get my Keyboard to work since it needs gnome accessibility runtime to automatically show when clicking a text field.

          And also xfce is more than light enough not to take up more than 1-2 secs of the total boot time

          The flatpak thing was just the jellyfin-media-player so I can play my music from jellyfin too, but I guess ill just set up DLNA so I can stream to the device from my Phone

      • uuldika@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        look into NixOS! there might already be a package for it. and NixOS can be very good about not duplicating dependencies.

        • Euphoma@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I had a 200 gb ssd on my laptop and kept running out of space because all the old generations from nixos,

          • uuldika@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            nix collect-garbage, comrade! there’s also another command to clean up older generations. if you’re using git to version your nix config, you only really need to keep two generations: the current, and your last successful boot, since you can recover by git checkout.

  • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Yeah flatpak won’t work on my Nokia 3310 either, what a shit software…

    Edit: if you upvoted this comment, your kneecaps pop when you pick up things from the ground

    • Smee@poeng.link
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m too old to pick up stuff from the ground, I use one of them claws on a stick. Also, the 3210 was a nice phone while the 3310 was for the hip kids.

  • Gerowen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Alternatively though, if an app has KDE library dependencies for example, it’s kinda nice to not have to install a whole other desktop system wide.

  • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Lol kinda wild to me seeing flatpak hate as a new Linux user (running fedora with kde). Flatpaks have just worked for me and it’s been fantastic

    • gamer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      If you’re new to Linux, then your probably not familiar with the full Linux community yet. Much like in real life, online Linux spaces tend to have a very loud minority of conservatives who hate progress.

      Usually you’ll see them hating on things like systemd, 64bit architectures, containers, new packaging systems (like Flatpak), immutable and experimental distros (like Nix), Wayland, “bloated” desktops like KDE or Gnome, and much more.

      And just like in real life, the antidote is to not take another person’s word for it. Do your own homework/try things out yourself and arrive at your own conclusions.

    • rice@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      whoa look at mr rich boy here with a drive that costs more than $2 on ebay

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Flatpaks work great on my laptop, but they have can have issues if you use multiple hard-drives or partitions. Especially for gaming.

  • beastlykings@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m coming back to Linux after a hiatus. I’ve spent most of my time with the Debian flavors. Not afraid of the command line, but not an expert either.

    I’m trying out Bluefin right now, semi-immutable atomic os based on silverblue, based on Fedora.

    On normal installs, I usually change and install enough stuff, that when it comes time to upgrade to the next os version, I’m sometimes not able to without introducing instability or it outright falling. The former more common than the latter.

    Let’s just say I got used to reinstalling and starting from scratch, especially if I experimented too hard and broke something big like my DE or drivers.

    So with bluefin I’m hoping to leave everything that’s core, alone. I’m trying to rely on flatpaks, app images, and distrobox for everything else.

    So far so successful. I’ve only got a couple minor gripes, some limitations of flatpaks. But I’ve also only been at it for like a week, so we’ll see.

    I guess my point is, flatpaks have a place 🤷‍♂️

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is where I’m at too. If I go crazy and start installing stuff natively to experiment I end up with extra stuff auto configured that’s no longer needed and random problems I’m too lazy to figure out how to solve. Flatpak doesn’t do that and I don’t have to worry about that. I can install random stuff to play with and uninstall it cleanly. Some packages need more system access than flatpak gives natively and with those I’ll make the decision of if I want to set it up and tear it down manually or not.

      Storage is cheap, my time not so much.

  • swelter_spark@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I liked Snaps and Flatpaks fine when I first started using Linux, and the distro I was on treated them the same as software in the repo, but I eventually started to avoid them because of the space they take up, and because I got tired of constantly having to mess around with permissions to try to get things working. Now, if something isn’t available in rpm, I use AppImage or a tarball, or compile it myself.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago
      • rpm: signed payload and manifest with signatures in bill of materials that integrates and coordinates with system db and allows enterprise content review and validation at every step and/or easy back-out.
      • flatpack/app image - none of these.

      Anyone interested in build, security, deployment, should have issue with that. But look at its corp champions and discover their motive.