He referenced how self hosted compilers can have malicious code as part of their binary file and how it would be impossible to detect once a backdoor had been introducedin some version.
He argues since rust people are “too political” and “actively harm non-rustaceans”, he doesn’t trust the software built by them as he is a conservative.
What are his arguments against Rust? It’s not vulnerable enough to memory-based attacks?
“Too politicial” apparently. At least that’s what he said in the 4 minute snippet I managed to endure.
And by his definition too political means any community saying gay and trans people are normal humans and should be allowed to exist.
Not wanting to maintain a multi-language repo, and not wanting to maintain support for rust integration
Edit: I kinda assumed the guy in the pic was that kernel maintainer who kept throwing a stink about Rust code, but it’s apparently not
He referenced how self hosted compilers can have malicious code as part of their binary file and how it would be impossible to detect once a backdoor had been introducedin some version.
He argues since rust people are “too political” and “actively harm non-rustaceans”, he doesn’t trust the software built by them as he is a conservative.
This is from his video title “can we trust rust?”