Citing national security fears, America is effectively banning any new consumer-grade network routers made abroad.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has updated its Covered List to include all foreign-made consumer routers, prohibiting the approval of any new models.

For clarification, the FCC says this change does not prevent the import, sale, or use of any existing models that the agency previously authorized.

That Covered List details equipment and services covered by Section 2 of The Secure Networks Act, which, by their inclusion, are deemed to pose an unacceptable risk to US national security.

According to the FCC, this move follows a determination by a “White House-convened Executive Branch interagency body with appropriate national security expertise,” in line with President Trump’s National Security Strategy that the US must not be dependent on any other country for core components necessary to the nation’s defense or economy.

Its determination was that foreign-produced routers introduce a supply chain vulnerability which could disrupt critical infrastructure and national defense, and pose a severe cybersecurity risk that could harm Americans.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Afaik, you’d want hardware acceleration for the actual packet routing, or it’ll be quite slow/inefficient. So any ASIC for routing packets would be considered a “router”.

      I wonder if there exists an open router design based on an FPGA platform…

      • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Tell that to the poweredge r210 ii in my closet running PFsense with its CPU barely getting touched despite four NICS, two of them 10gbps.

        You’re thinking of switching hardware.

        That being said I might go hit up mikrotik while I still can for switches. Shame cuz I was hoping to wait until they got PoE versions of the CRS310-8G+2S+IN, but I think they wanna get rid of the crusty old stock of CRS112-8P-4S-IN. They made a similiar newer switch but it only runs swos instead of router is which is bunk.

        Ubiquiti stuff can still be flashed with openwrt so I’m good on APs I think once my dlink dies, even if it’ll be overpriced.

        Worst case I just buy em like I do my FPV flight controllers: from Ali Express

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Interesting, yeah I’m not actually well versed, that’s why i began with “afaik” hah. My experience with EdgeRouter is that you basically have to enable hw offloading to get the full throughput, and my assumption was that probably all off-the-shelf routers are doing something similar for them to be usable in such a small/cheap/lower-power box.

          When you say I might be thinking of “switching hardware”, I assume you’re referring to “managed switching”, and isn’t that just routing without any NAT? Like, if your pfsense router has 4 NICs, then it has to do the job of both a router and switch, no? First one, then the other for each packet?