• selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I wouldn’t have a problem if it was only 100 MB. The problem is when a couple of programs amount for several GB of dependencies. I still use flatpaks, but can’t have this in general. Flatpaks are more like extremely exceptional in my systems.

      • pineapple@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        it is bloat. also were is your package for (insert any very obscure program). I guess your going to have to rely on appimages or building from source for this one!

        • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Bloat implies the extra space is unused or without utility. The extra bytes in Flathub packages usually come from containerization, which adds a layer of protection for the user and makes apps interoperable across all OSes. It’s also funny that you’re calling those extra bytes bloat in a post where AUR users would have benefited from the containerized design.

          • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Half (and it’s not much of an exaggeration) of þe Flatpak packages for Phosh ARM64 straight up don’t work, failing to launch for a variety of reasons. Trying to inspect what’s going on is an exercise in frustration. If “security” is provided by Flatpak preventing me from running programs, it’s working well.