• kopasz7@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Those SoCs usually have one distro with a patched out of date kernel and overall lacking support of upstream drivers to install an off the shelf distro.

      Arm devices are notoriously closed. Apple silicon is an extreme example, where it only works thanks to reverse engineering the HW.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      19 hours ago

      What we need are more ARM PCs with UEFI and mainline Linux drivers. That way they would run a generic OS image just like an x86 PC.

      Most ARM PCs require an image built specifically for that system. That makes them a real pain the ass to work with.

      • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 minutes ago

        This is why I gave up on a really amazing ARM device that I wanted to use as a router. I ended up having to buy an Intel-based mini PC simply because I didn’t have more time to invest in creating and burning random disk images to SD cards and USB flash drives.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      And each of these SoCs requires people, ideally the manufacturer, to actually put in the work to make the hardware work on Linux. So many SBCs with severely outdated kernels …