How does it stack up against traditional package management and others like AUR and Nix?

  • Shareni@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Nope, and that’s the worst part of nix. I’m actually planning on writing a short startup guide, but I need to solve a few more issues first.

    But, this should help you out until then:

    The home.nix should be automatically generated, and that’s where you put all of your packages. I left a few as an example.

    NixGL is needed to use openGL (nixGL lutris for example). It works in most cases, but I couldn’t get alacritty or kitty to work. There are some ways to have packages automatically use it, but I still haven’t tried them out.

    Flake allows you to select the correct nix repo (stable/unstable), appropriate home-manager version, and add outside packages like nixgl. It’s technically not necessary, but I wouldn’t go without it. Here I’m using the unstable repository, check the relevant docs if you want to go with releases instead.

    The equivalent of apt update && apt upgrade is nix flake update && home-manager switch --impure. I like cd-ing into the nix dotfile directory (all of the files are in there and symlinked to ~/.config/ locations), but you can also use command line arguments to point to the flake.

    nix flake update updates the package definitions to what’s in the repo

    home-manager switch install them, and also updates any configs it’s managing. The --impure is only needed if you’re using nixgl (bad build commands depend on system time).

    nix-collect-garbage to force a clean up of unused packages

    https://search.nixos.org/packages makes searching for packages a lot easier

    https://mynixos.com/search?q=home-manager+ same, but for finding options to configure packages through home-manager

    Comment if you need help

    update: removed nixGL from flake and home, installed it through nix-channel in order to not use --impure during home-manager switch