tsugu@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前I like both, but usually prefer Ubuntuslrpnk.netimagemessage-square167linkfedilinkarrow-up1525arrow-down176
arrow-up1449arrow-down1imageI like both, but usually prefer Ubuntuslrpnk.nettsugu@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square167linkfedilink
minus-squarelengau@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前So why would Canonical switch to another technology that came after what they made and doesn’t cover their biggest use cases for snaps?
minus-squarelengau@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前But if flatpak doesn’t meet the widest use case of snap, are they really describing flatpak?
minus-squarelengau@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Flatpak is not a solution for packaging a large portion of the types of software Canonical packages with snap, such as database servers, kernels and containerisation software like lxd.
Removed by mod
So why would Canonical switch to another technology that came after what they made and doesn’t cover their biggest use cases for snaps?
Removed by mod
But if flatpak doesn’t meet the widest use case of snap, are they really describing flatpak?
Removed by mod
Flatpak is not a solution for packaging a large portion of the types of software Canonical packages with snap, such as database servers, kernels and containerisation software like lxd.