• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    That’s the point. Most users don’t know how to do that, can’t be bothered to learn, so this laptop would have been e-waste under most other circumstances.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think their confusion comes from OPs title.

      Why is it “e-waste go brrrrrrr” when OP is presumably saying they’re keeping this laptop out of the machine? _ machine go brr is a dumb meme in the first place, people using it the wrong way makes it even dumberer.

      • FippleStone@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh man I cannot stand it, it’s a tolerable meme format at best when used correctly, but I find it insufferable when it’s applied mindlessly like this

    • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes but if a person uses a computer and doesn’t want to learn stuff, issues that come from it are (at least partially) their fault.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sure, but that’s kind of a nonsequitur to the question of whether this would have ended up as e-waste.

        A: Would this end up as e-waste?
        
        B: It's the end-users' fault if it does.
        
        A: Okay, so...would this end up as e-waste?
        

        We don’t literally know, because we can’t predict the future, but we can be reasonably certain that old tech like this laptop would have become e-waste in the hands of your average user, regardless of whether they should have been expected to take the time to learn how to prevent that or not.