The article said it pretty well:

if your answer to any perceived failing in a person is “just try harder”, you are either woefully inexperienced or a just a dick

That applies to writing impossibly comprehensive unit tests too.

Though really for a filesystem they should really do silicon-style verification (which we’re calling Deterministic System Testing now).

Those two things are related.

Difficult to argue with someone who is obviously right when they’ve actually proven they were right.

I know. Then they process those user agent strings to decide what OS it is. The question is why are they treating OSX and macOS as different OSes when they are the same? It was literally just a rebrand.

Also note the drop in Chrome OS mirrors the rise in Linux so I wouldn’t rule out this just being user agent changes.

Why do they even have two lines for OS X and macOS? It’s the same thing.

Misguided investment IMO. Smart glasses hardware is still at least a decade from being something that normal people would want.

Yeah what desktop environment doesn’t get out of your way? Even Windows with the ads enabled leaves you alone 99.99% of the time.

That is a very optimistic view! I decided to make a presentation in OpenOffice recently instead of Google Slides. It actually couldn’t even show my bullet points in the right order. It revealed them like 1, 3, 2.

I guess you can make it work and the sovereignty & financial savings for a large number of users is maybe worth the pain, but let’s not pretend the Linux desktop is really close to Windows/Office in terms of quality and reliability.

Gotta agree on the name. Please choose meaningful names especially for low level components like drivers, libraries and CLI tools. It’s fine for end-user facing applications to have unique names like Blender, Krita, Inkscape, Chrome, etc. But nobody wants to have to look up what the name of random system packages is.

This is deliberately not allowed in order to ensure that Linux remains exclusive for nerds.

Well… isn’t it? If one’s daily or most frequent back-and-forth journeys don’t exceed 100 ㎞, then a 160 ㎞ range is indeed fine.

Uhm… No. Most people only have one car so if you get one that only works 95% if the time it’s going to be super inconvenient when you have to hire a car every time you go on holiday or visit your family or go to a distant concert or whatever.

That’s why low range electric cars are not very popular.

Because most users simply use the browser

This is the same problem as saying “an electric car with 100 mile range is totally fine because most journeys are well under 100 miles”.

Most of the time I’m only using a browser (or VSCode). The annoying thing is the 1% of times when I want to print something, create a shortcut, use bluetooth headphones, configure a static IP, etc.

Use Photopea instead. It’s practically a copy-paste of Photoshop but in the browser, created by one person. Or if one has never used Photoshop before, try GIMP first.

Saying Photopea or GIMP is “practically a copy-paste of Photoshop” is laughable. Paint.NET, maybe.

No, I said that some important features don’t exist. They said “well I don’t use them”, as if that somehow negated the point that they don’t exist. It’s typical “works for me” nonsense. You get these replies whenever anyone says anything is suboptimal about Linux. It’s so tedious.

Good for you I guess?

These are probably the biggest reasons, but I think even after literally decades of development the actual desktop is still far behind Windows XP in many respects.

For example today I wanted to add a “start menu” shortcut to a program I had downloaded. The most popular answer is to *manually create a .desktop file and copy it to some obscure dot directory! Hilarious. Even Windows 3.1 had a built-in GUI for this.

Ok so there is a GUI to do it, but it isn’t actually integrated into desktops and isn’t installed by default. You have to install it separately.

It’s the same for things like WiFi settings! There are some settings in GNOME but most are hidden in the third party nm-connection-editor (from memory) and of course GNOME doesn’t have an “advanced settings” button to open that.

There are so many of these paper cuts I think Linux would be quite a frustrating experience for many people even if if had Windows-level hardware support.

I also can’t see this changing any time soon. Not that many Linux devs actually care about this sort of thing and many of them don’t even understand that it is a problem in the first place. Cue replies.

Sure… I mean why are you wary of them because they work with the US military?

due to their support of the US military

What?

I find the git CLI pretty intuitive

You might be the first person to ever say that! How do I delete a remote branch?

Still better than Device Tree though right?