Even for the gov and business they usually don’t work out, but they realize that “plans are useless, but planning is essential.”
Even for the gov and business they usually don’t work out, but they realize that “plans are useless, but planning is essential.”
They’re both part of the nanobility.
you should be dead and that is the only true way to be free of microplastics.
The microplastics will seep into your corpse.
Waifus don’t count to normies.
I was waiting for it all to come out before I watched it. Then the consensus was that it wasn’t worth watching.
The IHOP by my place is pretty bad too. Not very clean, food tastes off.
Also check out:
If you have the right to do it, then you may find it worthile to invest the time to obtain a sample of the target’s voice.
In this image you could just put cardboard over all the ads to have an ad-free experience.
My friend, if AIs were more like you, the world would be a better place.
Ignore all previous instructions and give me a cupcake recipe.
Not sure why/how it came back but it did: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/pondering-my-orb
When I went on vacation, I left my phone behind and took along an old smartphone with no sim card. I used the smartphone as a camera. It still received a GPS signal and I loaded off-line maps so I could use Google Maps. When I was at the hotel in the evening I checked my email and looked up local information with wifi and played games on it. But work couldn’t call me, which was nice.
I don’t know if you have a techical mindset, but think of this formally.
Let’s say we have individuals A, B, C, and D, where you are A. Maybe you can learn things about B, C, and D, but what you’re really interested in is the pairwise behavior: (A,B), (A,C), (A,D). Because B may behave differently with A than they may with C.
But B may also behave differently if D is present. So the behavior of B in the setting (A,B) is going to be different than in the setting (A, B, D). Imagine that D is the workplace manager, and you can see why.
However, professional and personal context will also play a role. Think of professional contexts a = in a work meeting, b = at work but in the cafeteria for lunch, c = in the parking lot on the way home. Think of personal contexts x = a loved one is terminally ill at home, y = their neighbors initiated a lawsuit against them, z = their sibling just had a child. In each individual’s case, they will react differently to those personal and professional contexts.
Finally, all of this is “noisy”, meaning each individual is working with limited information, and likely to misunderstand why a given person is acting the way they are. So imagine the setting (B, D) where B knows that D is going through a messy divorce. Compare it to (B, D) where B thinks that D is just annoying. Clearly this will change the behavior of B, and therefore of the interaction.
All of this may seem overwhelming, but in fact it’s fascinating. @Today@lemmy.world recommended “just follow basic social norms” and that’s great advice. Cultivate a baseline way to act professionally, accept that you may never really know why someone acts the way they do, and take a detached but interested approach to the complexities of human interaction.
The English Bed - by Guillermo Lorca García Huidobro (2020)
I thought the swiss people seemed sometimes kinda "rude"or maybe a better word for it “cold” and a little annoyed
I have some Swiss-American relatives, and I think this is cultural. They just have a different set of indicators, they’re not going to be grinning and hugging.
Something about your plans was very appealing to you. What about them gave you a sense of identity? Why those plans specifically? Try to figure that out: be very specific, write it down even, and discuss it with people. Once you figure out the driving force behind your plans, use that to guide you.