Right‽
Heck, that guy who set up a camera in such a way to encourage a monkey to take a selfie didn’t win his copyright case.
He likely cropped the pic afterwards and touched it up.
I don’t see how that’s fundamentally all that different than going back and forth with an AI and then tweaking it’s output.
That’s even before taking into account the copyrights of the original “training materials”.
The camera guy did a lot more to earn the copyright than vibecoders, imo. Had the guy just started a video himself and then grabbed a still frame from when the monkey pressed the button again (or set up the camera to take pics every 1/4 second or whatever), he’d have a 100% valid copyrighted photo unlike the viber who’d at best have some pseudocode.








VaultWarden is already it’s own thing code base wise, so, it likely won’t effect the hosted portion of it at all.
The apps though, sounds like right now, it sounds like it won’t make a difference, but, I think moving forwards it’d make sense to consider forking and making VW branded versions.
With that said, right now, the only reason you can choose your own domain is because BW allows you to self host their own product and VW just made their API respond the same way as BWs, so, as long as BW keeps allowing the self host option, I would imagine that there really isn’t much they can do about VW other than starting to play games with their API, which would also impact their paying customers.