Also means that it will hopefully protect against malicious actors in between

From the FAQ, What is Stremio?

Stremio is a modern media center that gives you the freedom to watch everything you want.

Yeah, I just think that maybe, just maybe, if MacOS is also inspired by UNIX, making a compat layer is not that big of a difference. Because MacOS supports a lot of productivity programs that may attract professionals to Linux too. Mostly adobe suite.

We need to develop darling too

Yeah, the difference is that this time an expert uses the tools as it should be. Not regular Joe feeding all the code with a prompt to “find a vulnerability”. Even then, this is a coincidence. But this discovery means there exists (maybe) a strategy that can be tried to detect similar exploits.

For the kind of supported data, one looks at the README and it supports a lot of different kinds of metadata, hence the generic description. A jpeg (or other image) metadata editor cannot edit metadata for geospatial surveys for example. But this application can. And manage it like any other CRUD application works. By providing users a way to enter a new entry, edit it, remove it, query it, all kinds of things really.

Tl;dr, the tool is called Metadata Editor and released under MIT. As the name suggests, it helps manage metadata for data. Currently supported standard includes:

IPTC

ISO 19139

Dublin Core

DDI-CodeBook v2.5

That’s… what I’m saying. Clean room implementation is legal. You accidentally arrive at the same conclusion independently. And yes, it is tedious to do it but it is legal.

How so? People come up with the same idea all the time independently of each other. When doing clean room implementation (the ideal best case), you are not liable if what you create at the end matches 1-1 with the original. You never know anything about the implementation detail of the original. Academia also acknowledged independent discovery and publication of many things. Why would clean room implementation be different?

I always see people with the argument that the developer labour is somehow being exploited. But have you never thought that maybe, just maybe, the person in question does not care? He just wanted to publish his creation and be done with it. He does not care if people are using it. That’s my case. I don’t care if people want to use my piece of cryptographic library. Just be aware that I am just some random dude, providing no support nor warranty. I make the library for my use cases and it works fine.

Ahh, yes. I read the official installation and it is indeed written in bold. AMD hardware with NVME drive targeted towards handheld. Yeah, would be nice for generic desktop too for living room PC.

Iirc, the requirement is basically a computing device than runs using AMD processor (I forgot about the GPU part, but maybe it must be AMD too), and uses NVME SSD. So, most modern system?

Is copyleft a requirement for FOSS?

Or maybe people don’t care about what their project looks like after releasing it?

P1 : Hey, I’ve used your code in my company project! P2 : Cool. I’ve got another job to do.

End

Maybe it is a violation when you are doing it all the time? Like, 24/7 you are using the whole resources available. Then yeah, I could see it.

Are you sure? Because that’s fucking dumb. If it was alà ISP, then it is understandable. Most ISP CANNOT GUARANTEE the maximum advertised speed, not outright violating ToS when you are able to use those full speed. Big difference there.

If systemd, of all things, manages to pull off universal packaging for linux, it would be funny lol

No, I bet it is some AI firm. nVidia is currently milking most of them dry and I would not be surprised if it is either Microsoft or Meta

The redneck engineering equivalent in CS

deleted by creator