data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9de3/f9de3ca43b543749a797253240357412969e462e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6446/b6446867cdb2168bc8ef0ee6a9997baaeceefff9" alt=""
21·
28 days agoIn principle it’s just “slimmer ARM”. RISC-V is also extremely dedicated to using memory mapped IO rather than older style IO x86_64 supports.
Think lots of registers, a fun zero register that is always zero, and memory mapped IO.
In principle it’s just “slimmer ARM”. RISC-V is also extremely dedicated to using memory mapped IO rather than older style IO x86_64 supports.
Think lots of registers, a fun zero register that is always zero, and memory mapped IO.
Good thing the world is that simple, you’re completely correct. Nobody who could theoretically prevent something they don’t like is not entitled to their dislike, duh!
I mean they could try that horse you insist the original commenter is sitting on.
What the fuck is with the person in the email chain implying not all drivers can be written in Rust? Rust does literally everything C can, nothing stopping you from using unsafe properly to achieve that.