• 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle

  • erwan@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlGoldilocks distro?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    There are a few improvements in Aurora over Silverblue that you might like.

    It ships with homebrew which is perfect for CLI tools.

    It ships with distrobox instead of toolbx which is much better. You can install any distro while toolbx is just a Fedora. For example I’m using Arch in toolbox because of the number of packages and the fact that they’re usually up to date (no need to wait for a major release).

    So far I never had to use rpm-ostree, and for VSCode I use distrobox precisely because of the permissions.


  • erwan@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlGoldilocks distro?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    For me atomic distributions are the way to go.

    You get a rock solid base system that get updated automatically, and every single user has the same image so you can’t get into a bug that’s only reproduced on your system because of your combination of system packages. If for any reason you have a problem with an image update, you can always boot on the previous image from grub.

    Then user apps come on top of that, and can’t break the base system.

    I know you tried Kinoite and got stuck, but there is always a way to unblock yourself and install what you want. If it’s not in flatpak there is homebrew (for CLI), and if it’s in neither there is distrobox. You can also do a rpm-ostree for native packages if all the others fail.

    You can also check universal blue, Aurora in particular if you want KDE. It’s based on Fedora Silverblue but with an improved out-of-the-box experience.

    https://universal-blue.org/





  • Windows have always been trash. Windows 9x were the worse.

    Windows NT was better, Windows XP was trash at release then got better with updates (the service packs).

    Windows Vista was a shitshow, then 7 was better. Windows 8 was horrible, the 10 was a bit better.

    Windows always oscillates between trash and acceptable. There is not much to “ruin” to be honest.










  • Nothing in particular, for the past few years I didn’t like the direction Ubuntu was taking but I stayed because I was too lazy to switch and it didn’t feel that bad.

    So I’m not sure exactly what was the last straw, maybe part of it was me getting a Steam Deck, discovering flatpak and understanding how bad snap was compared to it.


  • It just works, just like Ubuntu before they started pushing snap down everyone’s throat (which is what made me switch eventually.)

    I had a bad image of RedHat/Fedora’s package management from the time deb was much superior, but no they caught up and are on the same level (I know, it’s probably been a while).

    I also like how they mostly package upstream without too many changes. When Ubuntu started upstream was a bit lacking so making changes was necessary to get something that looks like a consistent OS rather than a patchwork of packages, but now it’s no longer needed. Ubuntu is no longer the only distribution with that level of polish.


    • In the 90’s: Slackware, then RedHat, then Debian, then Progeny (Debian based), then shortly Mandrake (RedHat based)

    • Early 2000’s: RedHat Japanese edition, TurboLinux (because I was in Japan and Japanese IME was almost impossible to get working on non-Japanese distributions)

    • Then I had fun with Gentoo looking at my terminal compiling stuff everyday and fixing broken package because I followed advices to activate crazy compilation flags

    • 2004: Ubuntu, that I used for nearly 20 years

    • Last year: switched to Fedora