The folks at ageless linux are just idiots.
They name declaration based age restrictions (age verification" and fight against actually good legislations instead of New York’s or Texan takes on the law (Those requiring actual age verification).
Instead of asking for changes similar to Colorado’s law (Open Source systems are exempt from the law) they spit acid all over the place.
Put NixOS below RHEL
Is this ragebait?
From a non techical user perspective.
I used unmodified GNOME 40 and 49 for a week. There were few changes, I could absolutely see myself using the older version and not missing much.
In my opinion GNOME 4X is as good as linux DEs get. I would like to see some popular extensions getting official support and native dynamic tiling, but besides that it’s hard to see room for improvement.
Removing X11 is a big deal, but most users won’t see it as such.
How many people were using X11 on GNOME?
Yes, it’s technically a huge change, but regular user won’t see a difference
I must check it out, thanks
Honestly, not much changed since GNOME 40.
Is it a bad thing? No
Do I want more changes? Also no
The only thing missing from GNOME for me is proper dynamic tiling. I’m trying Forge extension, but it feels clunky
Both macOS and Windows are the same thing: Proprietary garbage
If Windows 12 is as great as rumors say (Finally an agentic OS), I’m moving from linux