I switched to AirVPN right after I used mullvad but I was not that happy with their speeds (max speeds were around 500-600 Mbit/s), so I now use Proton. Proton is nice except that the port changes with every connection. Fortunately I found a fork of the VPN app that has support for automatically changing the port in qbittorrent. Other than that I’m pretty happy with Proton. :)
Mullvad is great. I unfortunately had to switch because they removed port forwarding, but I highly wish they didn’t.
Well, I at least chuckled.
I’m sorry you feel that way about fish Linux
Maybe…
We don’t know yet. It would depend on how it was integrated.
But yes you would need to crack the app.
Google didn’t really do anything wrong imo. App developers/publisher’s are the one that is actually using these APIs
You’re referring to the PPA repo thing, yeah?
No they actually have a real apt repo now.
I just answered the question you had.
Try Justwatch you see where movies and shows are available (if anywhere).
Yes, but how is it malicious to comply with the license? If the license doesn’t require the code to be usable without a backend they have fully complied. Does the license even require usable code at all?
As long as they give the source code they are required to give I don’t see any problem with it.
Depending on what OP actually wants to do it might be simpler to just install Linux normally in a VM. I recommend Hyper-v if you are using Windows Pro and if you are using Windows Home I recommend upgrading to Pro using MAS scripts or using a workaround to install Hyper-V on Home.
You could also use a hypervisor like virtualbox but they are type 2 hypervisors which are usually slower compared to type 1 like Hyper-v or KVM.
You said it was malicious though.
some companies will get creative with it and make their source available but in a way that is useless without the backend. And even if they don’t maliciously comply with the license, they can still charge for their services.
What is wrong with charging for your services?
Open source licences aren’t meant to make it impossible to earn money or anything. As long as companies comply with the licences I don’t see anything wrong with it.
If a licence wants to make it impossible to earn money they should put that in the actual licence.
That’s because Windows is generally very backwards compatible.
NTFS is case insensitive because it’s supposed to be more POSIX compatible than its precursors.
Personally I don’t give a shit about justifying my piracy. There are a lot of people in this sub that can’t do anything else.
Sure dude.
I paid for the product, now I’m gonna use it the way I want to.
Well obviously you are too scared to do that, lol.
P.S. If you dislike Nintendo don’t buy their products in the future and just pirate on a PC
I never said there was anything wrong with that, I have pirated multiple terabytes of various stuff including Nintendo games (though I play them on my Deck).
I was just explaining what your “philosophical” (🙄) reasons were.
Also you could just sell the switch if you don’t like Nintendo. Don’t pretend that you are forced to pirate or something.
They want free stuff.
Yeah, at least the ones I used have some kind of console/terminal you can use and often you can access BIOS and reinstall the OS if you want.