Move the emphasis and we have a deal! Cos-monix
Move the emphasis and we have a deal! Cos-monix
Ru-nix
Ironically, the answer might simply and sadly be chatgpt output.
There’s a good idea and some real potential here, but it didn’t quite land for me.
Why has nobody mentioned package managers? I can’t be the only one who cares about that…
" An artist never works under ideal conditions. If they existed, his work wouldn’t exist, for the artist doesn’t live in a vacuum. Some sort of pressure must exist. The artist exists because the world is not perfect. Art would be useless if the world were perfect, as man wouldn’t look for harmony but would simply live in it. "
Andrei Tarkovsky
“Elevated Jam Tracks” on youtube (mostly chords and no distracting words/vocals).
It might tell you to go a way that is unsafe, blocked, impassable, flooded, etc.
To assume that a GPT is right is to assume everything on the internet is right, as from that it arose.
To the victor goes the scholarship.
Then I suppose the question is reduced to how one should select the 5 people! :)
I would suggest getting an ortholinear keyboard. When I first switched to a Kinesis advantage, the FIRST thing I noticed was how many terrible habits I had of hitting a key with the wrong finger (even twisting my hand about, if you can believe that). Having keys in line with actual finger geometry cured that mess up real quick!
FREEDOM!!! :-)
Doctor: You must be allergic, what did you eat?
Me: It’s proprietary.
I just want to know if it is usable, or frustratingly slow.
I would whole-heartedly recommend Robert Martin’s clean coding lecture series. It may be many hours of your life, but it is free on youtube and well worth the time. I don’t exactly recall what he says about testing in his lectures, but it’s probably pretty close. If nothing else, it will teach you to critically consider programming structure in the abstract (instead of following formulae), and to write code with the intent for it to be read and maintained by humans.
I think he also has a series that includes “structured programming” (like early return vs deep nesting), but was unable to find it last time I looked for it. I recall having a shocked epiphany when he (i THINK it was Martin) demonstrated the exact way to clean up a function, that started out ugly, and ended up being reduced to literally nothing (the function was removed).
I was going to post something to CL a month or two ago, but was shunned away by new & intrusive PII collection… seemed offensive and discordant with the original spirit of CL, and I ended up “nope’n out” instead. RIP another internet era/icon.
Many code-reviewers likewise devalue tests, giving only a cursory skim over the unit-test section of PRs, if they examine them at all, and sometimes code-review itself is devalued to the point of a rubber-stamp (e.g. “great, we need someone from team X to approve it too… doesn’t matter who, though…”).
If I could tell you, you would be SHOCKED at how high-profile and recent this sordid project was; it’s literally in the news and discussed in my podcasts.
Maybe checkout kdirstat (gui) and ncdu (tui)