I’m spinning up a new seedbox and wanted to know what is everyone using nowadays? I was using deluge via the thick client and rutorrent previously. Are they still king? edit: I should have also mentioned that I plan on running this server headless so I will need to be able to access it via a thin client or a web browser

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      +1 for qBittorrent. I used to be a Deluge fan, but qBittorrent seems more performant and feature-packed.

  • qBittorrent is probably the most commonly used client. Transmission is another popular option, especially among macOS users, since it has a familiar design and feels more native.

    rTorrent is great if you want a CLI app, and ruTorrent offers a web frontend. Another option that you can run on a server is Deluge.

    You can control qBittorrent from Android using qBitController or from iOS using qBitControl (you can get it from AltStore after adding the Michael-128 repo). Transdroid supports other clients as well, and it’s my personal favorite. If you want to torrent on the Android device itself, check out LibreTorrent. For iOS, use iTorrent (also available on AltStore).

    If you already plan on self-hosting, or have root access on your seed box (or some other way of installing applications/deploying Docker containers), I also recommend setting up bitmagnet. It’s basically your own torrent indexer and search engine. It can also integrate with your *arr applications.

      • I never even realized that Transmission doesn’t support it. I just have I2P set up on my seedbox (but it typically requires root access, so unfortunately not everyone can replicate this). I would imagine it’s pretty flaky on macOS though? I’m pretty sure the vast majority of I2P users run Linux, so the macOS client probably doesn’t get as much development and attention.

        • undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I don’t know why i2p would be flaky on macOS. I run i2pd (hate Java) on Linux and macOS and it’s functionally the same.

          • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I don’t know why i2p would be flaky on macOS.

            That was just my assumption, because the modern macOS network stack is not exactly similar to Linux, so some changes would be required, and since it’s not that widely used (at least in the I2P community) it wouldn’t get tested and developed that much. But again, that was just my assumption.

            I run i2pd (hate Java)

            As a former Java dev: Completely understandable. i2pd is the only I2P implementation I will ever touch, the Java client is just a buggy mess with bad performance.

            • undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              A lot of the macOS networking stack (at a lower level) comes from FreeBSD. People have argued that the BSD network stack is superior to Linux whereas Linux runs applications faster. At a low level, I think this is still accurate.

              I’m a Ruby developer but I tried to port a Linux application written in C to macOS before and it was mostly rearranging positional arguments to system API calls; however there’s probably a lot more going on that I’m not aware of too.

    • XNX@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do you use altstore? Have you tried livecontainer to avoid the 3 app limit?

    • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Deluge always seems so underrepresented, but as far as I know it’s never had a version compromised with malware like some of the other popular clients. It also performs great when you are seeding over 1000 torrents as long as you upgrade to version two.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Better to use the underrepresented torrent clients. They have the least chance of enshittification.

        looks at µTorrent

  • Daddy Kuma@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Qbittorrent, Transmission and Ktorrent the Last two When some updates breaks Qbittorrent

      • SatyrSack@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Closed source, and their prominent “contains NO Spyware” disclaimer doesn’t quite instill confidence. I have also never even heard about it until now.

        • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I don’t use that client either - But to be fair the dev (Kevin Hearn) has a long history with P2P software e.g. depending how old you are you may have used his WinMX software back in the day. He isn’t known for sticking spyware/malware into his software so I sort of trust the software he puts out in that sense. He also maintains other non-torrent P2P file sharing software outside of Tixati.

          Of course it would be better if it was open source but he’s never been an open source coder AFAIK.

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I’ve had email communication with the devs and again, I’m a biased donor. They are just starting afloat on donations. Respect your closed source concerns completely, but it’s a superior piece of software imo and I see no signs of malificence. If you are an open source purist I get it, there are other options. If you are using any closed source software at all though, it would seem to me hypocritical to show a bias against this particular app.

  • radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Qbittorrent via a container and web UI on my NAS, lets me use it as a backend for *arrs as well as anything else, just have tag based directories for it so Software goes into one folder and TV movies etc in their respective folders.

    I personally like the setup a lot since I can always be a seeder even well after my ratio is hit.

    slskd hooked up to this as well to share everything music wise, gives me a nice way to reconcile stuff Lidarr can’t find and shares it all back for anyone to browse so hopefully helps someone downloadv something they’re searching for a FLAC of

    nzb360 on Android for management as needed, it hooks into Qbittorrent easily and gives me a nice place to do some quicker tasks for my overall infra