I ask this because I think of the recent switch of Ubuntu to the Rust recode of the GNU core utils, which use an MIT license. There are many Rust recodes of GPL software that re-license it as a pushover MIT or Apache licenses. I worry these relicensing efforts this will significantly harm the FOSS ecosystem. Is this reason to start worrying or is it not that bad?

IMO, if the FOSS world makes something public, with extensive liberties, then the only thing that should be asked in return is that people preserve these liberties, like the GPL successfully enforces. These pushover licenses preserve nothing.

OQB @ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world

  • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Imagine having to pay for each library your computer uses. We’d just as soon stop using computers than do that.

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Imagine paying for Windows


      I used an Open Source library for work.
      I asked my company to consider donating to them.
      Nothing…

      They’d rather pay for MS Teams even when it doesn’t work reliably.
      I offered to help with setting up a WebRTC server.
      Nothing…

      The only ones actually caring about donating to FOSS projects are a few of the developers, that realise the effort that goes into it and also have enough money to spare.

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I wonder if a dual-licensed non-commercial + paid commercial approach could work, but from my experience with FOSS developers, they tend to view non-commercial licenses as sacrilege…

          • refalo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            In their eyes, probably not… but you can’t have it both ways. Either you let companies take advantage of you, or you don’t…

            • ulterno@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 hours ago

              From what I see, there’s not much that can be done over here.
              You either use GPL Licensing and then look for other ways to get money (because only FOSS people will pay you when they don’t have to and there aren’t many of them, as compared to the population) or you use a non-FOSS license and eventually get bought by a corporate entity to get money, then get your project enshittified.

              Of course, you can say that you won’t do that, but after how many of them have gone back on similar claims, it can be hard to get others to trust you.
              Also, if (when) your project starts getting in the way of large corporations and their money and they realise you don’t sellout, you can expect them to start coming after your livelihood. And how many people do you think, would play chicken with them?