With the Linux Vendor Firmware Service serving more than 135 million downloads for Linux users updating their system and device firmware, LVFS has been working to get more hardware vendors to contribute either engineering resources or directly contributing annual dues as sponsors. Framework Computer is now the first one to have executed an agreement under these new sponsorship efforts.

Red Hat in employing lead developer Richard Hughes has contributed the most to LVFS/Fwupd’s success, the Linux Foundation has also hosted the project since it has shifted into their umbrella, AMD’s Mario Limonciello is among the significant contributors, and now Framework Computer is a new sponsor to the project.

  • aichan@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, when the political stance of the supported company is “I would literally murder you of I could” the politics become kinda relevant 🥲

    • HaraVier@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is that some hyperbole? Or is there a source to that? I’m out of the loop*, so apologies for my ignorance.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Yes, it’s hyperbole.

        Framework gave money or laptops to a bunch of different Linux projects and has generally been very active in the Linux community.

        One of the laptops they gave out went to DDH, who in addition to having a project that in reality is little more than an Arch script, also posts a lot of alt-right drivel online.

        Most famously him moaning about London being too full of immigrants - something made even more ironic given that he himself is an immigrant to the UK. Clearly he meant non-white immigrants.

        It’s unknown how much Framework knew about his unsavoury opinions, and plenty of other projects they’ve supported have been very progressive, so it doesn’t seem like they’re choosing to support only people who align with a specific political stance.

        A lot of people are frustrated with their response to the criticism - that they’re a small team that don’t want to wade into the politics of each project they donate a laptop to. Which I kind of understand, but I also understand being miffed at them for sending a laptop to a super hateful person then shrugging their shoulders and saying “look, we don’t want to be political or have to research the personal opinions of people in the community”.

        Personally I think it’s more of a fuckup and PR misstep rather than endorsing any particular world-view.