I have three Ethernet interfaces, namely eth[0…2]. eth0 is connected to my VPN router and eth1 and eth2 are connected to my public facing router. eth0 is the standard interface that I normally let my Linux instance use. I now want to set up a container that hijacks (makes unavailable to the host) eth1 or eth2 in order to run various services that need to be reachable from WAN through a Wireguard tunnel.

I am aware that the man pages for systemd-nspawn say that it is primarily meant to be a test environment and not a secure container. Does anybody have experience with and/or opinions on this? Should I just learn how to use Docker?

For now, I am only asking about any potential security implications, since I don’t understand how container security works “under the hood”. The network portion of the setup would be something like:

Enabling forwarding kernel parameters on the host

Booting the container with systemd-nspawn -b -D [wherever/I/put/the/container] --network-interface=[eth1 or 2]

Then, managing the container’s network with networkd config files, including enabling IPForward and IPMasquerade

Then, configuring wireguard according their official guides or, for instance, the Arch wiki.

Any and all input would be appreciated! 😊

  • TVA@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Sorry, not 100% sure what you mean “converting its spec”

    If you mean take an existing docker and move it to a standard installation, that would depend on what all is needed. Some installations include a ton of other dockers with databases and such and you’d basically need to move them all independently and ensure the programs talk to each other properly.

    For others, it’s be as simple as making sure the contents of your original docker data folder is in the right place when you launch the app and you’re done.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Oof, okay. Although you could probably just merge the dependencies in your LXC container? It works like this with creating appimages.

      About “converting its spec”: i assumed the main friction point would be the LXC tooling not knowing Dockerfiles. Forgot the name of the containers specification file (Dockerfile), since it was a while ago since i last looked into containering.

      Huh, there’s also “Apptainer” now? Portable and reproducible, seems interesting.