• mrbigmouth502@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m pissed that systemd has made a change that paves the way for age verification, and is unwilling to go back on it. The change they added may not do much on its own, but I worry about future consequences.

    Since it’s rare for large organizations and projects to go back on things like this, I’m considering moving my systems over to non-systemd distros. At the very least, I hope a fork without the userdb birthDate variable hits the AUR.

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t like the law, but I don’t like the phrase “It’s illegal to use Linux in the state of California” more. Systemd is not a political lobbying organization, they’re a software organization and its their job to make legally compliant software.

      We need to fight these laws, but being mad at Systemd isn’t the solution since they aren’t the culprit.

    • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly, it’s kind of a big nothing burger. As long as the distro that you use doesn’t actively enforce the age verification, it’s just a field that is there and that is really inconsequential.

      • Ilumar@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s the way I see it as well. Some distros are going to want to or be forced to comply with the laws, so offering the option seems sensible on systemd’s part.
        Systemd is not forcing distros that don’t want to comply to use the field.