return2ozma@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 5 months agoIt's 2026, which tech did you realistically think we would have by now?message-squaremessage-square118linkfedilinkarrow-up185arrow-down12
arrow-up183arrow-down1message-squareIt's 2026, which tech did you realistically think we would have by now?return2ozma@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 5 months agomessage-square118linkfedilink
minus-squareHazy@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-25 months agoThe thing is, we could do that right now. But it’s more expensive and increases patient exposure to radiation and is just unnecessary. Right tool for the job, if it ain’t broke etc.
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months ago if it ain’t broke Ironic choice of words
minus-squareHazy@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoA deliberate sprinkling of irony helps me cope with existence
The thing is, we could do that right now. But it’s more expensive and increases patient exposure to radiation and is just unnecessary. Right tool for the job, if it ain’t broke etc.
Ironic choice of words
A deliberate sprinkling of irony helps me cope with existence