Most psychologists don’t care about Freud’s work outside of a historical sense and kinda hate him as a person. His work was quite literally used as an example of pseudoscience by Karl Popper.

And yet for some reason philosophers have an obsession with integrating his views into their work and artists keep using his views as inspiration and analyze existing works via the lens of psychoanalysis.

Why?

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Modern psychology doesn’t necessarily support a subconscious, either. At best some individual practitioners like the concept.

      Freud’s big contribution was therapy, or a “talking cure” as he called it. The rest was cocaine-fueled nonsense

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That is bullshit. Everyone with a pulse knows the brain processes information unconsciously. It’s the basis for most of cognitive psychology, in fact.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Unconsciously, sure. Like, it turns three colour channels into a rainbow plus shades. Subconsciously, no, there’s no (measured) suppressed self that wants to fuck mom or whatever.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Of course there is. For example there’s the study where they brushed chairs with testosterone.

            The response to that chemical being present demonstrates goal-driven personality operating below the level of consciousness.

            Uncovering unconscious motivations is like 95% of therapy. Everything that isn’t yet articulated is the subconscious.