• thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    As a Thunderbird user and Rust fan, I approve this integration. However I want to mention that Thunderbird is good as it is and actually don’t think new features are needed. Only compatibility with other software or protocols could be better (which the Rust integration aims to improve). And to be honest, a way to disable some of the feature bloat would be preferable too, as I don’t use lot of the additional stuff (but I make use of the RSS Feed reader).

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      JMAP support would make a huge difference to expand the only open/free (as in speech) competition Exchange has.

          • Slotos@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Please correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t this allow one to represent virtually any resource as a mail inbox/outbox with access through a generic mail app?

            I’m working with a specialized healthcare company right now, and this looks like a way to represent patient treatments data as an intuitive timeline of messages. With a local offline cache in case of outages. Security of local workstations is a weak point of course, but when is it not…

            • dragonfly4933@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yes, but that is always possible with most protocols, including imap.

              Take a look a FUSE and you will see all the creative things people have done with filesystems. Or DNS, lots of fun things have been done with that also.