maybe because a huge fraction of users wouldn’t understand more advanced tutorials, or it’d be just too much effort
maybe because a huge fraction of users wouldn’t understand more advanced tutorials, or it’d be just too much effort
trying to execute that requires the caller (so user shell
from using adb most likely) to have the same uid as Google Play which should never be the case
afair
I’m not old, I just like how short the command is
jokes on you one of my not so much into linux friends had it and his setup kept breaking, now he’s about to install fedora
sd-boot or directly booting EFI stubs rocks
crunchy but old snack
sometime ago I had my home directory managed by systemd-homed
on Fedora (before 38 even afaik). the SELinux policy wasn’t configured properly for it though, so I had to keep setting it to permissive mode. for some stupid reason I remember running the command to do that on every. single. boot. lol
yet another reason to use sd-boot?
“horrible” being mostly sensible for the average user, as well as basic telemetry for making development much easier. but muhhh nooo with that information they can know who exactly I am!!! preach!!!
the amount of mold…
something something nix?
wow I kept opening man:somethingwithoutsectionunfortunately
in firefox instead of doing that lol
So is it pretty much an unofficial Spin then?
maybe it’s a good thing these blind haters of anime stuff aren’t nearby
Bleeding edge? Isn’t that just called stable?
It’s not even a single binary blob. Shows your competence around this topic. Feel free to continue rambling and whatever without knowing anything about it.
And what knowledge makes that opinion have any factual value?
You don’t know the details of why it was chosen, yet you complain about people with obviously more knowledge on these topics having chosen it… reminds me of science deniers.
To 1.: dri
instead of all
would handle hardware-accelerated rendering. Then some webcams or controllers won’t be accessible though. This one’s a bit complicated, since the necessary portals for e.g. generic USB device access aren’t yet there.
To 2.: portals should be used instead of that. Using them doesn’t require these permissions.
To 3.: click on details and see. This is Flathub making it easy to understand for users.
Permissions should make clear whatever dangerous things an app can do. If not, why do all this effort of isolation? Firefox could delete everything in downloads, either by accident on Mozilla’s side, or a privilege escalation. If the app used portals instead, it couldn’t, at least without user interaction. Or a browser security vulnerability could open up any USB devices to webpages. It’s all about what could happen with granted permissions. And these can 100 % be fixed in at least some way.
There’s also a still in-development rival for GNOME, Valent. And it’s a native program and not just a shell extension. I prefer it, and maybe it even has more features.