You did it. Count me among the folks who would reply to you.
- 0 Posts
- 112 Comments
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•How many people are only still alive because they don't want their suicide hurting others as much as they hurt every day?9·23 days agoGratitude is a revolutionary act in times like these. Since you’re going to die, anyway, you might as well enjoy the ride as much as you can and teach your child to do the same. If you manage to make the world a better place along the way, then so much the better.
Peace.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•am i “ableist” for disliking erratic behavior?7·25 days agoWhat is “erratic” for you? What is “off in a bad way” for you? There might be a clue in there somewhere.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•How to tell the difference between being burnt out and just being lazy?12·1 month agoWhat a great way to learn how people interpret behaviors as “lazy”. Intriguing…
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•How to tell the difference between being burnt out and just being lazy?3·1 month agoThe difference between lazy and burnout lies in how much you trust the person not working.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•If I created the word "shlarmle" for purely phonetic reasons, what should be its definition?3·1 month agoIt could be both! Why not?
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•How do you feel when someone apologises too much?51·1 month agoExcessive apologies can feel disingenuous and perfunctory. That makes it difficult for me to know when an apology is genuine. That erodes my trust.
Excessive apologies can signal to me that the other person sees me as a threat, and I don’t want to feel like a threat, so I feel attacked.
But I could also choose to interpret excessive apologies as a sign of past trauma, so I could choose to have compassion and patiently ask the other person to talk to me about what’s going on. I can share how I feel and hope that they feel ready to discuss what’s happening for them. Patience would be key.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•How do the likes of JD Vance and Drumpf rationalise no more DEI when they have wives who are DEI? It makes no sense.102·2 months agoNow it depends whether you mean actual DEI or the nonsense that companies do in the name of DEI or the unfortunate overreaction that some people support related to DEI due to the resistance to actual, reasonable, sensible DEI.
“… regardless of all other factors…” sounds like the second of these.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto Linux@lemmy.ml•An introduction to Magit, an Emacs mode for Git6·2 months agoObligatory mention of
lazygit
for those who prefervi
and its descendants.No, I’m not making any claim regarding which is better. Hold your cards and letters. In many other universes, I’m a daily user of
magit
.
Not constantly changing things until there is something significant to release is a path to the stability that I value. Meantime, packages run and the system works.
I never wanted a hobby, but rather an operating system. I’ve been using Pop! for over six years. I only had one stretch where I felt like I was chasing annoying bugs and I don’t remember it clearly enough to remember how long it lasted.
I don’t understand why such minced oaths are socially acceptable among people who don’t want to swear for religious reasons. Do they really not realize that they’re thinking “fuck” and effectively saying “fuck”?!
And what about the Catholics who take the position that a sin in thought is just as evil as a sin in deed?
Either say “fuck” or stop even thinking “fuck”. Anything in between is disingenuous bullshit.
To answer your question, no. I try to comply with folks who don’t want me to swear around their kids, but I volunteer to do that as a courtesy and can’t be coerced into it except by real force, such as threatening my physical safety or livelihood.
Excellent! I missed DaisyDisk. It looks great!
Our naming convention was comic strip characters, hence Hobbes, Casper, and Quincy.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Bernie Sanders keeps saying Ol-ah-gawky but I thought it was o-le-garky?4·3 months agoThe second vowel is an unstressed “i”. In most varieties of English, since it is unstressed, we pronounce it as a schwa, which sounds roughly like “uh”.
If you’d like to articulate that syllable, like you might do in French, then pronounce it like the “i” in “sit”. That’s completely optional.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•how do I grow a thicker skin and change my reactions to adversity?31·3 months agoYou seem to be ready for either mindfulness meditation or Stoic philosophy. Neither one provides a quick fix, but the benefits accumulate over time.
I’m sorry that you’re going through this. I wish you peace.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Is this grammatically correct: "The monkey who I'm wondering if can see my ears."2·3 months agoThere is an implicit binary choice here, so “whether” fits. Both work, although I, for one, prefer to use “whether” for binary choices and “if” for possibilities with more options. This is similar to my preference for “between” only for two things and “among” for more than two.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Is this grammatically correct: "The monkey who I'm wondering if can see my ears."2·4 months agoThe phrase “I’m wondering if… can…” needs a noun or pronoun between “if” and “can”. As soon as you try to remove that (by moving it out to “The monkey who…”), the phrase stops being grammatical. We’d understand you, but it would require significant effort to parse the sentence. That seems to be what makes this sound strange, no matter what we try to do with it.
I don’t know whether other languages can do this, but English can’t.
Maritime Madness, Candied Habanero or Lime Cilantro.