• brie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    6 months ago

    As a reminder, you can always just uninstall OneDrive and call it a day.

    Until Microsoft takes that option away as well…

      • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        6 months ago

        They never reinstalled OneDrive after an update… yet

        (I hate how I have to uninstall useless shit after updates)

    • wagoner@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      I did that and it was a mess, with warnings about being unable to backup that I couldn’t get rid of. I had to reinstall to try to turn off syncing, then remove again. But it’s so integrated that my desktop is still under a OneDrive subfolder and it’s still referenced in various places.

      Is there a guide to completely removing this from Windows 11 cleanly?

        • wagoner@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          No idea but, after a quick search to learn what this is, I’m not sure how it would help were it to be an option.

          • derbis@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            You can disable so-called essential components and I believe it ships without almost any of the bloat. So essentially you could just take one drive out, or not have it in the first place. Or at least that’s my hope

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, it’s also not “just” if it’s one of what feels like hundreds of steps now to make the OS somewhat usable.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    6 months ago

    Isn’t apple doing the same?

    Designed to fill the 5gb immediately so you’re going to buy more cloud space immediately

    When I had an iPhone, there was an annoying red dot on the settings icon “warning, you didn’t enable cloud backups for photos”, and if you enabled it become an annoying red dot “warning you ran out of iCloud space”

    • abrahambelch@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s not an Apple fanboy but imo it’s a lot more transparent on their side. There’s a switch for each and every service to use iCloud or not in the settings. Services don’t just re-enable their usage of iCloud after some random update and most importantly, they don’t just re-install apps you previously deleted. Or bloatware.

      • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, it doesn’t get re enabled but I totally hate that annoying red dot on settings if you don’t set iCloud

        • B0rax@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          That red dot should disappear if you disable iCloud (yes, it is different from not setting it up… it is not good, but you can get rid of it)

        • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Oh no, an annoying red dot. Microsoft are straight up hoovering up users data into the cloud by automatically enabling syncing. These two things are not even close to the same.

          • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            6 months ago

            it’s a dark pattern deliberately chosen to let people get annoyed and pay for icloud. On windows people instead will accidentally fill their onedrive account and that’s it. They won’t even know that they’re using it. It might send some scary emails like “your cloud backup is full!!!11 you gonna lose everything!!111” but those go directly in spam. Error messages in windows for regular users appear like “����� �������� �����������” - their eyes don’t have the right encoding to understand the message, so they just click OK and dismiss it. Instead, the red dot is prominent in the home screen of every iphone and bother also those that don’t read the error messages…

            • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Wow. I genuinely can’t believe people are upvoting you for this. Like yeah, I super agree it’s a dark pattern. Stealing people’s data is WAY worse though, uploading potentially sensitive photos or documents to their cloud with no user input. But according to you that’s fine because it’s less obtrusive and annoying? Yeesh I’m glad I don’t have your priorities.

              Edit: Like, have you seen most people’s home screens? They’ll have a dozen other “red dots” and it becomes part of the background. In the same way as you talk about with Windows errors. Here’s mine:

              Oh noooo, a red dot on the Settings app…with all the other red dots…

              • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                For me it was annoying enough to switch to android. I really felt like I had to use iCloud, forced through my throat. I have ocd and a red dot means “I need to open this app immediately RIGHT NOW to clear it” - and then your can’t clear it until you subscribe

              • esaru@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                There should be an option to say “I’ve read it and I decided against it” that makes the dot disappear.

                • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Yes. I completely agree that there should be. However the other poster’s claim that it makes Apple just as bad as Microsoft turning a syncing feature on without user consent is ludicrous imo. That just feels like giving them a free pass on what is, I believe, an as before unseen escalation in the erosion of user privacy by large corporations.

    • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s always the option to store things locally. You want to get fancy, you can set up a NAS for remote access.

      Saying “isn’t X also doing Y” implies the behaviour itself isn’t the problem, when it is. Doesn’t matter who’s using dark patterns for rent-seeking; it matters that we’ve normalized it.

  • Feydaikin@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    6 months ago

    Isn’t the entire point of the newer versions of Windows just to force the engagement with applications you normally wouldn’t use?

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Pretty sure later updates for Windows 10 started doing this too, or at least it did on my PC.

    Had to completely uninstall OneDrive to get it to stop - which Microsoft sure do make quite difficult to do.

    • Salvo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      The bottom has dropped out of the OEM software licence market. Microsoft have to find a different way of making money. Their loss-leading hardware sales have not borne fruit so they are getting desperate.

      All they have left is services, which means that the only way the can actually make money is selling out their customers private information.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        That describes the business model of basically every internet company that survived the dotcom bubble.

        • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Remember what that landscape looked like. The only major players we know today that existed then are Microsoft and Apple, and Apple had just been bailed out by MS to get in front of antitrust issues. Amazon existed as a bookstore, Google was not around yet, Facebook would still be several years out … MySpace wasn’t yet around. AOL was still a behemoth. Adobe sold perpetual licenses.

          This is a far more recent development.

          • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Google was the first example I thought of, because they were founded in 1998, solidly before the dotcom crash. They survived because they hoarded data.

            My point was that every company going into the bubble thought they had a product they could monetize, but virtually all of them failed in favor of just hoarding everyone’s data. Amazon and eBay were competing for ecomerce supremacy, but now even they are just privacy violators for various reasons (amazon via AWS and Alexa, eBay in the interest of detecting malicious account behaviour).

            MySpace is an example of another unsustainable social media model in the vein of many dotcom era services. They died out as soon as Facebook realized they could hoard everyone’s data.

            All roads lead to privacy nightmares. It’s the fossil fuel of the internet, and enshitification is the climate change.

            • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              I could swear Google wasn’t broadly a thing yet. The startup I worked at in 1999 had an elevator pitch for how we “could be the next Yahoo.” Not a great thing to aspire to in retrospect, but Google wasn’t on our radar.

              • pbjamm@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                They were there and they were superior to the alternatives almost out of the gate. I was working for a video game company at the time and me and the rest of the IT dept made the switch almost immediately because the results were clearly superior. Made me an advocate for them for years, probably far beyond where I should have given up. I am not sure which product cancellation finally changed my mind on them. Probably it was around the mess of Google Talk/Chat/Hangouts mess of apps.

              • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                You’re right, they weren’t a “household name” yet. But they were probably more than a little worried about surviving at the time. Turns out they picked the winning strategy.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Every. Single. Post.

      Like every time windows is mentioned the Linux users come out to try to convert people. You guys are so fucking annoying. Just make a post about Linux. We dont want your shit ass OS. We need one which actually runs the software we use. Guess the posts are good to block these annoying Linuxers

        • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.orgM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Please try not to escalate comment threads that are already tense. Remember to be(e) nice. I think think it is understandable that someone might be frustrated with the regular, low effort responses to practically any mention of Windows or a number of other topics.

            • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.orgM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              No worries. I don’t think anybody in the comments here have crossed any lines yet; I’m just trying to defuse things before they get to that point. I’m finding that !technology is one of the communities where we’re most likely to have to lock threads or remove comments, other than maybe !politics, and I’m trying to be more proactive about reminding folks to deescalate when things get tense.

              • Salvo@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                This is one of the things I love about the Lemmy community. No one wants to argue, every one can be passionate about their opinions, but still respect other people’s passion.

            • esaru@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              It’s not helpful because it’s not discussing content but attacking a person’s character. This leads to emotions running high rather than letting your reasoning win the discussion.

      • esaru@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        When there’s a post about privacy issues, expect alternatives with more privacy be mentioned. It’s just that there are so many moments that big corporations violate user’s privacy nowadays, so that’s why you see it that often.

      • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        Hey, I totally get your frustration here, but in the future please keep in mind the primary ethos on Beehaw and try to be nice in your comments here. I sympathize with how irritating the constant barrage of “just install arch” as if that’s a simple fix for every problem, and I think it would be valuable for users on this forum to think about this before they comment, but let’s try to stay respectful and kind to other users. Thanks!

      • Salvo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I used Linux back in the 90s as my primary OS. They were simpler times. Since then I have used BeOS, various versions of Windows and (primarily) MacOS.

        I am seriously thinking of going over to Linux as my primary OS because of all the TechBro “AI” bullshit that Microsoft, Adobe, Apple and Google are trying to ram down our throats.

  • ky56@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Doesn’t Windows 10 already do that? I could never get the freaking thing to leave my files behind and disable itself.

    Windows 10 LTSC for the win if you have software you can’t yet abandon.

  • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    devil’s advocate: this will save the vast majority of user (which are completely tech illiterate) from loosing their most important data

    lets be real, none of them will use a private or foss backup solution any time soon.

    I’d rather not they loose their important family photos for that oh so horrible crime of offending my privacy nerd sensibilities

    • muhyb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 months ago

      Except it won’t be their most important data. Either their very first files from their desktop (up to 5 GB), or random 5 GB files (no idea which). Once it’s filled quickly, it will start nagging about buying more storage.

      • dodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m not confident my tax documents aren’t saved to my dektop.

        I usually air gap onto an external disk, but I’ve been busy recently.

    • zygo_histo_morpheus@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think that it’s quite bad if Microsoft puts peoples family photos on their servers without the user realizing it. That’s not a niche privacy nerd sentiment, I think that a lot of people would find that creepy. Having the option easily available can be really good for a lot of non-techy people but it should be very clear what stays on your computer and what doesn’t, and how to keep something private if you want to, which I’m not sure that it is if Microsoft quietly backs up Documents, Pictures etc.

      • off_brand_@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Right, I recall news from years ago where a bunch of celebrities’ very private photos backed up to iCloud were leaked. They may or may not have known they uploaded those to iCloud, I dunno. But imagine what’s up there if you don’t realize you’re doing a backup. Not just photos, but like scanned documents with vulnerable information. And all that personal info in a centralized server is a big ol honeypot for a malicious actor.

        It’s not hard to see why this is a vulnerability, is what I’m getting at.

    • jaden@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Actually, my father in law just lost 3 months of work yesterday because he synced his documents folder that had an old copy of his book on OneDrive. None of the cached files had his new stuff. Maybe if OneDrive was made well, it would prevent data loss.

    • araneae@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Counterpoint: My sibling had their goddamn desktop ransomewared by this thing when they dared to uninstall it. It isn’t privacy nerd sensabilities, Windows now behaves like malware under certain opaque conditions and at unpredictable intervals. This was four years ago on Win 10. How great do you think non savvy people are about clicking things they don’t understand anyway and essentially springing a trap?

    • Salvo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      The problem is that they are not actively asking permission.

      They are technically legally asking permission through the EULA, but nobody reads these.

      Apple do this differently, they require the user to opt in for each of their services, and except for a pitiful amount of storage, the user has to pay for a useful amount of storage. This makes the user the customer, instead of the product. They could make it easier to roll-your-own “cloud” storage by NAS, but I assume that it isn’t worth their effort.

  • SurpriZe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    I already have one drive. It’s installed in my PC. Why would I need another?