• iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I wouldn’t want one myself, but I don’t understand trying to ban something just because I don’t like it.

    But apparently, that’s a popular sentiment

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Not ban, but make the licensing process more rigorous for a vehicle that takes more skill to operate safely compared to a standard car. Anyone can get a higher class drivers license if they pass the test, but the majority of people won’t bother so you end up with less trucks driven by people who just want to look cool.

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If people want to look cool, why not let them enjoy life? Should we perhaps ban hairdressers, in favour of a mandatory buzz cut?

          • iii@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 minutes ago

            I think you’re confused. It’s the driver that’s supposed to looks cool, no?

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Because the rest of us have a right to life, too. Ever heard the saying, “Your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins”? That’s colorful, but it’s not even true; people have an expectation of a certain reasonable amount of space around their bodies, and even entering it with your fist might be considered assault. The concept that one’s actions and choices affect other people is what’s important here.

          That’s the problem with giant pickup trucks: They affect other people on the road, and the problem with giant pickup truck drivers is that they either refuse to recognize this fact, or they enjoy infringing on the rights of other people to enjoy life. Either way, it’s bad for society, where we all have to live together somehow. Mullets and man-buns, by contrast, don’t materially affect anybody else in the slightest.

        • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Because trucks have been proven to be more dangerous and make any accident more likely to be fatal? They also present unique safety challenges not present in smaller cars, namely they have a huge blind spot in front of them like any other tall commercial vehicle. If you’re going to drive a more dangerous vehicle, you’d better actually know how to drive it safely.

          • iii@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            There’s indeed many people that claim it’s very dangerous, and women should cover their hair in public!

            In both cases I’d rather see people happy and just enjoy their lives

            • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              Hard to enjoy life spread across the pavement like a crayon by a truck.

              Believe it or not, some lifestyle choices have consequences external to the person making the decision

              • iii@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                I won’t be enjoying life when my daughter gets raped neither! Better cover her up!

                • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  Great comparison. Just as asking the woman to cover up is ineffective, so is trying to enforce pedestrian safety on the pedestrian side. Much more effective is to prevent the suspect/driver! Glad we came to an agreement.

                  • iii@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    17 hours ago

                    You have to pretend to have placed thoughts in someone else’s mind in order to feel better?

                    Quite weird

            • Horse {they/them}@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              There’s indeed many people that claim it’s very dangerous, and women should cover their hair in public!

              that is barely even tangentially related to the question

              2/10, must try harder