So as I look to build my first dedicated media server, I’m curious about what OS options I have which will check all the boxes. I’m interested in Unraid, and if there’s a Linux distro that works especially well I’d be willing to check that out as well. I just want to make sure that whatever I pick, I can use qbittorrent, Proton, and get the Arr suite working

    • adhocfungus@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      That’s what I’m running. I’m sure you could squeeze more performance out of a specialized OS, but headless Debian is fast and easy enough.

    • compostgoblin@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Are there any resources available for how to do this? I feel like I more or less understand how Docker works conceptually, but every time I try to actually use it, I feel in over my head very quickly

      • dingdongitsabear@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 days ago

        look for docker-compose + whatyouwant specifically, it’s way more straightforward. once you have one set up, it get easier adding on different software.

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 days ago

          The best thing is: if something doesn’t work, you tweak the compose file instead of having to retype or edit a command.

          And you can have a GitHub of your compose files and any supporting config files.

          I don’t get how some people can raw dog a docker run command!

  • cybirdman@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    I use Unraid and I’m loving it. Super stable, easy to manage, set up dockers, let’s me pool my hard drives and set up parity. Highly recommend. Only thing that I’ve had a hard time with is finding a stable flash drive - you’d be surprised how many start to fail when used 24/7

    • maxprime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      Came here to suggest unraid as well. There are probably better options, but for a first timer, I can’t imagine a better solution. The ability to just add a hard drive to the array with virtually not configuration, as well as adding up to two parity disks is great. Caching is super easy too.

      Plus they now support zfs so there’s that.

    • Kettrick@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      Unraid would be a very good choice for someone who is reaching out and asking this question. Debian can do the same but I suspect it’ll be easier to setup and manage on unraid.

      Disk management in unraid is also great.

    • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      The thumb drive isn’t used all the time. I’ve been using a cheap USB drive that cost me like $12 several years ago, and haven’t had any issues yet. It’s been running constantly for the last year or two.

  • Dempf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 days ago

    Now that Truenas Scale supports just plain Docker (and it’s running on Debian) I think it’s a great option for an all-in-one media box. I’ve had my complaints with Truenas over the years, but it’s done a really great job at preventing me from shooting myself in the foot when it comes to my data.

    I believe raidz expansion is also now in stable (though still better to do a bit of planning for your pool before pulling the trigger).

    • DonnieDarkmode@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      The raidz stuff, as I understand it, seems pretty compelling. A setup where I can lose any given drive and replace it with no data loss would be very ideal. So I would just run TrueNAS scale, through which would manage my drives, and then install everything else in docker containers or something?

    • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      I wouldn’t use Arch on a Server. Everything you install will probably be in a docker container anyway, so fast updates for system packages isn’t important compared to stability. Good choices would be Debian or Fedora Server. I personally use Fedora but the reason is just that I use Fedora on Desktop too, so I know they have really good defaults (They’re really fast in adopting new stuff like Wayland, Pipewire, BTRFS with encryption and so on) and it’s nice that Cockpit us preinstalled, so I can do a lot of stuff using a WebUI. Debian is probably more stable tho, with Fedora there is a chance that something could break (even though it’s still pretty small) but Devian really just works always. The downside is of course very outdated packages but, as I said, on a Server that doesn’t matter because Docker containers update independetly from the system.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Nah me neither, I had my desktop mindset going there. I use truenas scale, couldn’t be happier.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    I use Alma because RHEL is designed for enterprise stability. Debian is also a good option.

    Just don’t use Ubuntu. They do too much invisible fuckery with the system that hinders use on a server. For basic desktop use it’s fine, but never for a server.

    Edit: but you should be doing most stuff in Docker anyway, so the actual OS isn’t going to matter too much. If you’re already comfortable with one base (Debian, RHEL) just use that one or a derivative.

    • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      Just don’t use Ubuntu. They do too much invisible fuckery with the system that hinders use on a server.

      Would that warning also apply to Mint, since it’s based on Ubuntu, as well as other Ubuntu-based distros?

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        21 days ago

        I wouldn’t use Mint or other desktop-focused OS for a server. Ubuntu’s advantage of newer packages gets largely negated by how long Mint takes to release a new major release, so I’d rather use Debian.

        I do think Ubuntu is fine for servers too, like almost any other point release distro.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 days ago

        Probably. I don’t know what Mint or others do under the hood, but I do know they’re definitely targeted at desktop use.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 days ago

    I assume any Linux or *BSD distro will work, especially one with Docker (which is most/all of them?) so you don’t have to worry about things being packaged for your distro so long as there’s a docker image. My server is Alpine Linux.

  • undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 days ago

    I use Alpine Linux for server-based stuff because it’s so light and the packages are kept up-to-date.

  • nis@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 days ago

    I use Unraid on my NAS. I like it for storage, I don’t like it for running services. It’s still running my media stack, but only until I get that moved to a Debian server.

    Depending on how involved you want to be and what you want to learn, Unraid might be a good fit for you. It’s easy and mostly just works.

    • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      I second UNRAID, but also for your media stack. I have my home server running UNRAID and around 20 services, with zero issues.

  • nafzib@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    Like others in here, I also set mine up with Debian and docker compose. Since it’s an always on server I wanted maximum stability. I don’t use unRAID, so not sure about compatibility for that.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        I run nightly archiving backups using Borg Backup.

        It’s compression + de-duplication algorithms have me able to store 18 historical backups of about 422gb ea, in only 367gb of disk space.

        That then gets mirrored to a cold storage drive manually every few months.

  • supplier [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    I’ve been running my stack on FreeBSD for a while now. I cannot recommend it enough; solid as a rock, no surprises. BSD license is different from GPL though, so some software cannot be migrated with the same name, but there are drop in replacements that are usually better anyway.

  • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    I have been fighting with Docker and Fedora on these exact items all weekend. Good luck