• MyNamesTotallyRobert@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Installing arch without archinstall is way too much fucking work. I’d much rather spend time fixing the 10% greater likelihood of encountering issues post install than doing all that fucking bullshit manually. The command line is better for a lot of things but configuring partitions and mount points is not one of them. I demand a fuckin gui for that stuff.

    • Mio@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This is why arches based distos are taking off. They help with picking packages etc to save time.

    • apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The rationale in the OP is that with archinstall, an inexperienced user will have no idea where to even begin diagnosing any issues post install. Whereas installing manually is sort of a barrier to entry that ensures you know what you’re doing.

      • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 minutes ago

        That’s a stupid reason to make an installation as painful as possible. I can follow the installation wiki but I just don’t have time for this. And an inexperienced user can follow the wiki or another how-to and finish the installation but still be lost if something breaks later on.

    • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      That’s why I went with EndeavourOS - nice installer, some changes and tweaks to the default settings, but after that it uses the arch repositories and there’s no difference to arch anymore afaik.

  • funkajunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I did it the manual way probably about 10 times on my Linux learning journey, it was a really good way to learn how Linux itself worked. Now I just use archinstall every time.

    I’ve done it, I’ve gotten the satisfaction from it, but it’s not gonna add any more inches to my e-peen.

    • Auth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      thats fine and thats the exact usecase for arch install. This meme is for people who never install it once manually and use archinstall to get a working configured system.

  • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I’ve installed Arch manually exactly once. (Just for the bragging rights, lol)

    My go to way is just installing EndeavourOS. It’s basically Arch, but with a nicer installer and reasonable defaults.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I got to where it expected me to partition the drive manually and noped out. I was doing that in the 90’s when I compiled my own kernel. Ain’t nobody got time for that today.

    • dzsimbo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I use Endeavour, btw. Nah, I don’t think it’ll catch one.

      I’m super stoked to be on an Arch-based system, but things have been so easy I have earned no bragging rights what-so-ever with it.

  • underscores@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I use arch btw, have been for 5 or so years, I open the gates to those who want to use arch install

    You are not any lesser for not wanting to install arch manually

  • kautau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    “We need more people to use linux, look at what MS is doing to people.”

    People who have never used linux trying to use and learn linux by using an installer built by awesome members of the Arch team.

    “C’mon do you even linux?”

  • Bongles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    People here are always talking about different distros, trying this one and then that one until they found what they like. Are you guys really just reinstalling your OS that often? Reinstalling all the programs you want and everything?

    • AccountMaker@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      When I started out, I used to change distros like socks lol While you do have to reinstall programs, having a separate /home partition means that you can keep your stuff between changes

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Archinstall made my root partition 25 GiBs the first time I ever messed around on arch. That was fun when it filled up.

  • SkidFace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Honestly, I had wayyyy more issues when using archinstall than just installing it normally by the wiki. I might just be stupid though :P

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Installed manually first then later using archinstall. I came across an issue that wouldn’t format a partition. Saw the issue on github too. So had to format manually and continue.

  • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Oh, you use pacstrap and arch-chroot, do you? Back in my day all we had was cp and install and we liked it that way! Kids these days wouldn’t know how to install SLS without their Yays and Pac-men.

  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I installed arch without it and it was a fucking struggle. Didn’t know it existed til after. Like actually hours after

  • Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Installing Arch ‘the proper way’ is a pilgrimage all Linux users should take. After that, they can fly with EndeavourOS at their convenience.

  • Green Wizard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I followed the wiki and pulled off a successful install… On a vm. Once I felt confident and ready I remembered arch install was a thing and thought “sure I’ll try it, it’ll definetly break and I’ll just use the wiki to install” then it worked without a hitch. I’m still running arch with no issues.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The one time I tried to manually install arch on a VM years and years ago it didn’t work and I wrote Arch off. Guess what I’m running now? Well, Cachy, but lol. It’s Arch. And guess what? It’s got a simplified install process.