• surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Why the fuck would a handheld need an ethernet port?

    The pro-linux developers just can’t stop designing things to their own specific needs and skillsets. No concept of designing & marketing for a wide audience.

    • FlappyBubble@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      How can this possibly present a problem? People with specific needs developing new hardware - seems like a great idea to me. I can definetly see a use for this sort of device for network people. It could function as a travel router when needed. Another more obacure use could be penetration testing. Just because you can’t imagine a use case doesn’t mean it’s useless.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I can absolutely think of use cases for it. Would 100% support an expansion port for it.

        But as a default feature on a mobile device? Moronic design choice. But again, just a classic out-of-touch decision from Linux developers. Very on-brand.

        • FlappyBubble@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          What do you think the obvious use case of the device ia then? It runs Linux, has pogo-ecpansion and is obviously niché as is. I would argue that it’s a device developed by Linux users/developers for Linux users/developers. In this case an Ethernet post is on brand as you said yourself. No matter if you think it’s “out of touch” or not, whatever you mean by that.

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            And this thinking is exactly why it will always be niche. A complete inability & unwillingness to move beyond that.

            Might as well put a damn ham radio in it. The Linux crowd will love it, and everyone else won’t know what the hell to do with it. Seems what they’re going for.

            • 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              guess what, linux already is the perfect kernel for mobile devices, with android. there also is some work being done by kde and gnome to make wayland work well on general mobile devices. you clearly have no clue what you’re talking about and are just being a whiney asshole for no reason whatsoever.

        • 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          maybe linux desktop software developers should be allowed to develop software for their own use? after all, a lot of this work is done by volunteers. just because not all of it panders to the average user, doesn’t mean it’s bad software.

          This product is not reflective of any trend in the linux desktop software developer community at all. its just a badly designed, low volume tech product with horrible specs. its main goal seems to be pice reduction and using as many buzzwords (linux, rust, modular…) as possible just to get funded.

          please consider deleting your comments they are just pointlessly insulting toward free software developers.

          i am aware that linux is mostly corporately maintained, tough this does not apply to desktop applications / software a non server admin would use.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The pro-linux developers just can’t stop designing things to their own specific needs and skillsets. No concept of designing & marketing for a wide audience.

      You mean the wide audience that’s already catered to by every other tech company?

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          If here is where the niche products are I’m happy to stay. I haven’t been able to upgrade my phone in almost a decade because they’re all catering to the mainstream now. Most people don’t care about doing anything cool with their devices.

  • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ooof. After having a pinephone, I know what 2 or 3GB of RAM can handle these days. Not much, really. Specially the moment you open the browser. I’m going to pass from any project that doesn’t attempt to at least get close to this decade’s standards.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      My current Android phone has 4GB and it’s really smooth. I’ve got 90 Firefox tabs open and several apps. I’d love to see that level of optimization in a startup, but more RAM will just mask the bad optimization.

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        As an ex-Andrpid dev, all this optimization is what killed the creativity. Every feature you currently have is hyperoptimized (even with dedicated battery optimizations turned off for the most popular apps), and as a result nothing you can’t easily change is changeable anymore.

        Want a widget that self updates every couple minutes by connecting to the internet? Can’t have that, even if the user explicitly accepts it. Want to customize behavior of things in the settings? Nope. Want to hook into the phone memory and do crazy hacks? Not even with root. Want to keep running some checks to determine when to send a notification? Can’t do that either, non-push notifications are all scheduled in advance.

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Specially the moment you open the browser

      I’d be curious, did you profile if it’s for all pages or only some? I’d expect e.g. Facebook or Instagram to be more demanding than Lemmy or ProtonMail but to be honest I have no idea.

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        Prefetching, prediction, media, infinite loading (gradually) or aggressive tracking can increase the usage.
        I’ve had a single jira page use 6GB on Firefox.

        • herrvogel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          At least with that 6gb you get the nice, streamlined, intuitive and responsive user experience that we all know and love Atlassian for.

      • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I had a Windows Phone with 2GB of memory before, even (old) Reddit was horrendous, let alone Proton Mail with all its JavaScript and images.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can I just send you five years worth of „we’re sorry we’re behind schedule” messages and then ghost you instead? If so send me $159

  • Riley@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    A little worried that with swapping those components like that, it’s trying to be too many things for too many different groups of people instead of one exact thing.

    I think all I really want is something shaped like this with a keyboard, like an old Blackberry that could be used as a terminal.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      A little worried that with swapping those components like that, it’s trying to be too many things for too many different groups of people instead of one exact thing.

      Isn’t that exactly what made Raspberry Pis a massive hit? Being able to be so many different things for so many different groups of people, at a reasonable price point, maximizing the groups it appealed to?

    • dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      I agree that id like a nice handheld terminal, but dont a lot of people like handheld emulation consoles? Hell both of those sound great to me. I would totally get both the game pad and keyboard if i went for it.

      My real concern is that it would be garbage and/or the company would fold and support would become non existent.

      Maybe i just got burned by pocketchip

      • ZycroNeXuS@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Still have my Pocket CHIP. I look at it sometimes and sigh, thinking about what could have been.

        There are a couple resources around to bring it up to something approaching working on the internet, but not much, and not complete, last I checked.

        Thing was great for playing terminal roguelikes, though.

      • mesamune@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yep its one of the bigger issues. I wanted to get a uconsole, but ive heard the support is not the greatest. And the wait times are horrendous for the hardware.

        • Ben Hur Horse Race@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          its a standard android phone its marketed toward blackberry users who had no choice but to abandon the key2 as it just got too old to be in any way secure

  • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I see a lot of negativity in the comments. And yeah, this thing probably isn’t something I’m going to get, but at least they are trying something that isn’t a generic rectangle of glass like all the others. I miss the days of fun gadgets.

    • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I like the generic rectangle block of glass.
      Don’t understand why they insist on a physical keyboard.

      • DeaDvey@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I much prefer physical keyboards and find it difficult to use touchscreen, so a mobile, qwerty keyboard sounds great to me.

      • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        i am personally sick of shiny rectangles. physical keyboards are the buttons on your cars dash instead of the shiny rectangle on your car’s dash.

        • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Cars’ buttons need to be used while preferably not looking at them, that’s a pretty different situation to a smartphone

          • Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Also, I can somewhat type eyes-free on a smartphone keyboard because of the combination of autocorrect and my fingers remembering where the touch points are relative to the screen

          • netvor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Being able to use a keyboard without looking at it is a good thing.

            Only thing that makes it “different situation” for smartphone is that they just don’t have the keyboards. (And some of us kinda accepted that…)

      • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t mind it, but I also don’t hate that people are trying something new! Maybe it fails, but maybe it’s awesome!

  • Kajika@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    yet an other hardware from 10+ years ago. here we have an ARM Cortex-A53 from what it seems to be 2012. Maybe it is actually compatible with OpenGL 3…

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Our beloved consoles from the 80s and 90s were built with off the shelf parts, this is no different. Custom hardware in a niche market would lead nowhere.

      • 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        this comparison is really bad. consoles built with 6502s could get away with it, since everything they ran were games crafted in assembly to fit the timings to the last clock cycle. this product is supposed to run modern graphical software.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would pay more than 1000$ at this point for a modern high DPI open device with mobile internet compatibility and all drivers in mainline kernel. Just give me good hardware, I can handle the software on my on, tank you 🤭

      • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you want all drivers in the mainline kernel, you clearly cannot handle the software on your own. The reason why linux phones suck are the drivers that are either bad or don’t exist. The desktop (or palmtop I guess) environments are pretty usable if you run it on something with good drivers (like QEMU - my favorite phone).

        • Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yea, I did not phrase it well enough 😂 I just don’t want to be supervised by these large phone OS giants, because they think it is more convenient

          What do you mean with QEMU? Are you running a Linux VM on your android phone?

          • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It was a joke about the fact that PostmarketOS considers only QEMU a “main” device. Every real phone is in the “community” section because they’re too buggy. So the only good device to run that OS on is a virtual one running inside your desktop.

  • heavy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sorry, if it sounds too good to be true, it usually is. If you can’t make this stuff at scale, no way you could sell it at $160 a unit.

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      While I hope I’m wrong, I agree this thing will go the way of most Kickstarters. It is interesting, but it will never have appeal outside of the hobby space, and the cash needed to get this thing off the ground will be immense.

    • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Funny story. LG made something with a similar concept about 10 years ago and it never really took off. The LG G5 was a modular smart phone that was supposed to have a bunch of cool modules, but they never came to fruition.

      I had one, but mostly because I loved having a swappable battery. Never had to charge my phone, I would just have a spare battery charging on my desk and I would swap it out before I left the house.

      • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Jolla had similar concept too at 2013. I had one and back then it was really, really nice phone. Maybe not in a sense that flagship models from big vendors were, but I really enjoyed the UI and modular options was a huge selling point at least for myself. Then they started to work with a tablet which failed on pretty much all fronts and the whole company practically disappeared.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder who this is made for?

    The article calls it a “smartphone sized pocket computer”, but that describes smartphones too; they already are pocket computers. And they’ve had decades of design and development behind them.

    So… This device has a tiny touchscreen, and a keyboard, rather than having the whole thing being a touchscreen. So instead it has a modular bottom half… Which… Sounds like it’s trying to solve a problem that would’ve been a problem in like… The 90s, maybe, but has been solved by using… A touchscreen that can change the type of input it is flexibly, like smartphones do.

    It can’t call, like a smartphone, despite being a smartphone sized device. It has USB A 2.0 sockets and an Ethernet socket… Which makes it once again sound incredibly out-dated, like a device found in a time capsule, because USB C is smaller and faster than USB A 2.0, and can potentially be used for damn near anything. Which includes connecting to the Internet.

    Its battery looks very weak. Its CPU looks very weak. It has a tiny amount of RAM, and a tiny amount of storage. It is outclassed by any affordable, midrange smartphone, at nearly the same price too (if you avoid big brand names).

    • EmilieEvans@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      This device has a tiny touchscreen, and a keyboard, rather than having the whole thing being a touchscreen.

      That’s awesome. I still miss my Blackberry Passport (keyboard and large 1:1 screen).

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Tiny keyboards were a nightmare. There’s a reason why the Blackberry failed. You might like it, but then you’re part of a minority.

          • Tattorack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah they did. It was a pretty major factor. The moment touchscreen phones began to exist, Blackberry became past-tense.

            • kadup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’d say their software limitations are the reason they failed, not the keyboard. In fact, people really liked the final BlackBerry devices with Android and a keyboard, but at that point the company was already gone.

              But while iPhones were at the boom of Fruit Ninja, Angry Birds, iBeer and using Skype, and Google’s Android looked like ass but already had ad-infested versions of the same titles, BlackBerry had… corporate messaging? A really robust email app, I guess?

        • EmilieEvans@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Wide display: perfect for reading A4 documents

          keyboard: nicer to type. Also, the passport was as wide as, well … , a passport so it is a pretty decently sized keyboard which isn’t comparable to the tiny Q10.

          The passport was never meant to be a generic for the masses device. It is a beautiful specialized tool.

    • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      For people who like a concept more than practicality. There’s maybe a handful use cases that this specific device fits in that isn’t covered better by existing tech, but I guarantee if that thing actually gets kickstarted and arrives severely delayed in several years, it’ll show up in a couple YouTube videos with people sort of uncertain what to use it for, and in the vast majority of cases it’ll end up in some drawers after having been used a few hours tops.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        My thoughts exactly. I’ve seen several such devices already, probably the most expensive and over-designed one being the Apple VR, and it’s always the same story.

    • Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Full-size usb, Ethernet and keyboard mean you can use it as a Linux computer, install arbitrary debian packages, run shell scripts, python scripts, and you don’t need any dongles. This is the differential factor. You can’t do the same on a smartphone, and it’s not supposed to be a smartphone. Why would you need a separate sim card when you can simply tether Internet from your phone?

      I get that this device isn’t for you, but there are people who don’t want to write and maintain apps through apps stores and simply want to copy simple scripts into a small device they can have with them. It’s a niche market and good for them for trying to fill that niche.

      I wonder what they use for charging port if not usb c…

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can do all that with USB C and a touch keyboard. There is no good reason under the sun to make a device that is this dated in concept.

        Whatever the market is they’re trying to fill, it’ll be so extremely niche that this product is already a failure. It’s not the first time some kind of ultra niche product from kickstarter failed before launch because except for a small handful even cared.

          • Mikina@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I can do that and more on my Pinephone running Kali Nethunter. While it’s mostly a gimmick with awfull battery life, I’ve already used it a few times mostly in regards to wifi pentesting for my cyber-sec job, i.e when going to lunch onsite and you notice a new wifi AP you didn’t see when inside the office you’re working on.

            And since it has an USB-C, I can simply plug in a dock with two USB-As, Ethernet, PD and HDMI, to turn it into a full-fledged Kali desktop.

              • Mikina@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                I tried it like a year ago, maybe more, and it wasn’t ready for that. The battery life was awfull (which was a SW issue of the OS not being able to stand-by properly), and accepting calls wasn’t really reliable. It’s more of a gimmick and great as a side-phone, but I wouldn’t use it as a daily driver.

                But the situation might’ve changed.

  • als@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve learned not to get my hopes up with kickstarters but I’ll keep an eye on this one

    • phanto@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m still too dumb to learn… Ask me about my OKPad! In fact, ask me for my OKPad. Please, take the god awful thing off my hands!

      • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ok… I’ll bite…but for me to take it off your hands I’ll need to get a $50 deposit, and another $100 due after it’s arrived to me, you can pay shipping and duties as well…

        • phanto@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh, it’s awful! I mean, I knew it was going to be a bit heavier, with the dual screens, but I figured for media and stuff I could use it like a laptop. What I didn’t know? No keyboard on the e-ink. If you have it in landscape, you have a giant, unusable keyboard on the LCD part. No backlight on the e-ink. No way to move apps from one screen to the other without closing them out completely. But this is the part that really bakes my bacon… No portrait mode on the e-ink side. None. The good eReader review seems to have missed that it’s absolutely, 100%, stuck in landscape! Also, the battery is awful. I listened to a podcast for 10 minutes, display off, and burnt 10% of the battery. I have 10-year-old laptops with better battery life. I asked for a return/refund, but of course, crickets. Their only support is apparently on a Facebook page. I won’t be getting Facebook any time soon, but I am told that they are ignoring support requests anyways.

  • Solrac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    3gb RAM? 32gb emmc? This feels a bit like a raspberry pi project. Up the specs at least 6gb to at least no[t look like yet another microdeck with emulators, please… I like the concept, but as is, it leaves plenty to be desired

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Netbooks need to come back with modern hardware.

      If I need an ultra-portable computer one in a usable form factor would be amazing.

  • plm00@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m intrigued. And although I read the article, I’m not entirely sure who or what this is for. It’s cool, but… what?

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I feel like if the people who make raspberry pis made a phone (or phone components, mainly the board) I would buy the hell outta that bitch. This sounds kiiinda like that but idk that I actually trust it.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I feel like this would fit in some unexpected areas of mobile computing. Music, interfacing with other equipment (e.g. industrial computing), or other places where people might normally take a full laptop where that’s kind of overkill.

      I’m not really sure, and I kind of wish I had a need for one.

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think it’s for the Hacker News crowd that’s always clamoring for smaller phones, or phones with a physical keyboard. Potentially for parents to give to their young children, to be able to contact them without getting them addicted to screens right away.

      Not sure how big those markets are though.

  • mesamune@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    I like the form factor, but seeing the issues with supply on hackberrypi and uconsole, im hoping they dont have the same issue. Lots of people like that form factor (including myself).